2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting the Evaluations of Stereotypes: Bi-factor Model of the Stereotype Content Structure

Abstract: Stereotype dimensions—competence, morality and sociability—are fundamental to studying the perception of other groups. These dimensions have shown moderate/high positive correlations with each other that do not reflect the theoretical expectations. The explanation for this (e.g., halo effect) undervalues the utility of the shared variance identified. In contrast, in this work we propose that this common variance could represent the global evaluation of the perceived group. Bi-factor models are proposed to impr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…H7. In the process of perceiving groups, some global estimate of evaluation may co-exist with the SCM dimensions (see, e.g., Kervyn et al, 2013; Sayans-Jiménez et al, 2017). Taking into account the results of Study 1, perceived cultural distance might work as such a global evaluation in the case of interethnic relations and might show, for example, the degree of similarity between an ingroup and outgroup; majority group members can attribute lower warmth and competence to groups that differ more from them (van Osch and Breugelmans, 2012).…”
Section: Study 2: Comparing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H7. In the process of perceiving groups, some global estimate of evaluation may co-exist with the SCM dimensions (see, e.g., Kervyn et al, 2013; Sayans-Jiménez et al, 2017). Taking into account the results of Study 1, perceived cultural distance might work as such a global evaluation in the case of interethnic relations and might show, for example, the degree of similarity between an ingroup and outgroup; majority group members can attribute lower warmth and competence to groups that differ more from them (van Osch and Breugelmans, 2012).…”
Section: Study 2: Comparing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the SCM has been critiqued as being unable to theoretically explain the large amount of shared variance among the competence and warmth dimensions (Sayans-Jiménez, Cuadrado, Rojas, & Barrada, 2017). Thus, other models have been proposed to access the specific content of each dimension (as opposed to the content shared among dimensions; Sayans-Jiménez et al, 2017). Utilizing these models in future research would thus be beneficial to further our understanding of mother fault and CSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ujedno, u ovom smo istraživanju istovremeno provjeravali pretpostavljene odnose obiju dimenzija stereotipa i svih četiriju emocija s dvama tipovima ponašanja i to na razini latentnih varijabli. Za razliku od toga, dosadašnja istraživanja provjeravaju ulogu stereotipa i parova emocija zasebno za pojedine tipove ponašanja i to korištenjem manifesnih varijabli uz koje se veže pogreška mjerenja (Kotzur i sur., 2019;Sayans-Jiménez, Cuadrado, Rojas i Barrada, 2017). Neovisno o ovim prednostima, istraživanjem nisu obuhvaćene namjere pasivnih ponašanja, odnosno upitno je koliko namjera nanošenja štete izbjeglicama odražava aktivna, a koliko pasivna ponašanja.…”
Section: Raspravaunclassified