2017
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3289-16.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchically Organized Medial Frontal Cortex-Basal Ganglia Loops Selectively Control Task- and Response-Selection

Abstract: Adaptive behavior requires context-sensitive configuration of task-sets that specify time-varying stimulus-response mappings. Intriguingly, response time costs associated with changing task-sets and motor responses are known to be strongly interactive: switch costs at the task level are small in the presence of a response-switch but large when accompanied by a response-repetition, and vice versa for response-switch costs. The reasons behind this well known interdependence between task- and response-level contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has suggested an important role for this DMPFC region, which overlaps with the pre-supplementary motor areas, in both task control and action selection 58 . However, a recent study using an adaptive control task which required context-sensitive configuration of task-sets and stimulus–response mappings found that activation in the pre-SMA tracked task-set control cost but not response level control 59 . Intracranial recordings have further revealed that neuronal activity in the DMPFC is modulated by task-set but persistent activity in this region was not stimulus-specific 60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous research has suggested an important role for this DMPFC region, which overlaps with the pre-supplementary motor areas, in both task control and action selection 58 . However, a recent study using an adaptive control task which required context-sensitive configuration of task-sets and stimulus–response mappings found that activation in the pre-SMA tracked task-set control cost but not response level control 59 . Intracranial recordings have further revealed that neuronal activity in the DMPFC is modulated by task-set but persistent activity in this region was not stimulus-specific 60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, motor preparation engages predominantly left-hemispheric areas including the caudate head, AG and SFG as well as vmPFC and PCgC, core areas of the default model network (DMN). The pre-SMA is widely implicated in self control (Jaffard et al, 2008 ; Rushworth, 2008 ; Sharp et al, 2010 ; Cieslik et al, 2015 ; Hampshire and Sharp, 2015 ), and unlike the more posterior medial frontal structures that project to the lentiform nucleus, the pre-SMA projects to the caudate head (Zhang et al, 2012 ), in support of a hierarchical structure where anterior and posterior medial prefrontal regions each respond to task set and response control (Korb et al, 2017 ). As pre-SMA responds to conflict anticipation and the left caudate nucleus responds to motor preparation, it is likely that the right-hemispheric pre-SMA interacts with the left caudate head via its excitatory inputs to the right caudate head, which in turn inhibits the left caudate head through trans-hemispheric processes or subcortical mechanisms involving the pallidum (Watanabe et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major reason for this is that most functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies delineating neural substrates of task switching have simply contrasted mean activity levels between switch and repeat cues or trials. This work has implicated the lateral inferior frontal cortex, the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), superior and inferior parietal cortices, and the striatum in switch processes (Dove et al, 2000;Sohn et al, 2000;Brass andvon Cramon, 2002, 2004;Johnston et al, 2007;Braem et al, 2013;Ruge et al, 2013;Korb et al, 2017). However, mean activation contrasts cannot speak directly to these regions' potential roles in representing and modifying task sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%