2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-naïve health workers can use a tablet-based epilepsy diagnosis app

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity was 88% and specificity 100%. The app was shown to be easily-used by 15 computer-naïve village health workers (10). In a further study these health workers used the app to diagnose episodes in 96 patients, both established and newly-presenting; their diagnostic accuracy compared to an epilepsy specialist was 92% compared to 93% obtained by non-specialist doctors (11).…”
Section: A Smartphone Application For Episode Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity was 88% and specificity 100%. The app was shown to be easily-used by 15 computer-naïve village health workers (10). In a further study these health workers used the app to diagnose episodes in 96 patients, both established and newly-presenting; their diagnostic accuracy compared to an epilepsy specialist was 92% compared to 93% obtained by non-specialist doctors (11).…”
Section: A Smartphone Application For Episode Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two had previous experience of computers or smartphones but 11 of the 13 had a conventional mobile phone. They adapted well to using this unfamiliar technology [14].…”
Section: Community Health Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NPHWs who participated in this validation study were computerliterate but in the real world many NPHWs may have a very incomplete formal education and no experience of smartphones or tablet computers, although most possess basic mobile phones. We have since shown that a group of computer-naïve NPHWs had no difficulty in the technological aspects of using an app on a tablet computer [14]. The study below reports how these computer-naïve NPHWs, using the app, can diagnose episodes as epileptic or not, and how their accuracy compares to local physicians, with the neurologist's diagnosis as the "gold standard".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, emphasis should be placed on seizure semiology, the circumstances under which the seizure occurred, the convulsive phase and the post-ictal state, information needed for diagnostic classification, treatment modalities, and prognosis [ 11 – 13 ]. This has informed innovations such as use of scoring systems [ 14 , 15 ], smartphone app [ 16 ], and various contact sensors [ 17 ] to improve epilepsy diagnosis. However, these options may not be practicable for low-resource settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%