2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise emissions in wood chipping yards: Options compared

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine operators are particularly exposed to such harmful exhaust gases ) in conjunction with wood dust (Gulci et al 2018). Furthermore, using solution B reduces the rotational speed, which can reduce further impacts on operators such as noise (Spinelli et al 2016b) and vibration (Kończak et al 2020), thus improving their well-being (Kymäläinen et al 2021). However, stopping the internal combustion engine of many machines during idling is not acceptable, because in addition to its main function it provides energy for auxiliary systems such as maintaining comfort in the driver's cabin by providing power for accessories such as air conditioning, heating, TV, a refrigerator, and lighting (Rahman et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine operators are particularly exposed to such harmful exhaust gases ) in conjunction with wood dust (Gulci et al 2018). Furthermore, using solution B reduces the rotational speed, which can reduce further impacts on operators such as noise (Spinelli et al 2016b) and vibration (Kończak et al 2020), thus improving their well-being (Kymäläinen et al 2021). However, stopping the internal combustion engine of many machines during idling is not acceptable, because in addition to its main function it provides energy for auxiliary systems such as maintaining comfort in the driver's cabin by providing power for accessories such as air conditioning, heating, TV, a refrigerator, and lighting (Rahman et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cultured sample in this study, meanwhile, did not possess notable psychological resistance to the YW treatment facilities near home, while it had been initially anticipated that the surveyed participants may not welcome having YW treatment facilities such as the composting bins, chippers, wood shredders or grinders adjacent to their doorsteps, because of the associated negative and direct concerns such as noise, odor and other air pollution [28,45]. The result suggests that the sampled respondents, probably considering the naturalistic and bio-degradable natures of YW, did not have strong risk perception over YW recycling.…”
Section: Preference For Neighborhood-level Yard Waste Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Apart from composting [8,20,21], different city governments are leaving no stones unturned in the exploration of new and other feasible strategies to divert YW burdens away from environmentally unfriendly landfilling options. These alternative strategies offer strategies to turn YW to energy or resources such as woodcraft or furniture, wood chipping, bio-drying for solid recovered fuel, gasification-derived biochar, incinerations, natural degradation, mulching and anaerobic digestions for biogas, among others [1,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Prior Research On Yard Waste Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chipper disc or drum rotating generally between 1000 and 2000 rpm is able to comminute the biomass in regular small wood pieces (woodchips) [16]. Through the expulsion mechanism the woodchips are discharged on the ground or into a bin or carrier (Figure 1).…”
Section: Manually Fed Wood-chippersmentioning
confidence: 99%