2014
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.143017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical research misconduct need regulatory reforms

Abstract: The medical research misconduct has become a global problem. Except from countries like the USA, China, and Germany the exact figures of misconduct are not available. The research misconduct include fabricating the data, falsifying data, and plagiarism. The irresponsible research practices are publishing research data more than once, conflicts of interest is not declared, selective reporting of data and including an author who has not contributed at all and many more. About 2% of scientists have been found to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The “processing fee virus” was endemic in late 20 th century, became epidemic in early 21 st century and is now pandemic. [ 18 ] Our study revealed that SL showed the maximum number of publications in fee charging journals due to an urge to publish the articles as quickly as possible, which is often facilitated by these journals. It was observed that besides faculty members, there was a high percentage of self-funding among PG students for their publications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The “processing fee virus” was endemic in late 20 th century, became epidemic in early 21 st century and is now pandemic. [ 18 ] Our study revealed that SL showed the maximum number of publications in fee charging journals due to an urge to publish the articles as quickly as possible, which is often facilitated by these journals. It was observed that besides faculty members, there was a high percentage of self-funding among PG students for their publications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Essa conduta é considerada, por exemplo, como uma das principais responsáveis pela crise de reprodutibilidade observada no meio científico (Baker, 2016). No entanto, a comunidade científica ainda hesita em classificar o selective reporting como fraude ou como uma ilegalidade moral (Pickett & Roche, 2017), frequentemente tipificando-o como uma conduta científica irresponsável ou de natureza questionável (Bedi, 2014) ou, ainda, como um crime de escrita menor (Roig, 2003). Apesar disso, a literatura sobre correspondência fazer-dizer pode contribuir para o entendimento dessa conduta: o selective reporting ilustraria um exemplo de correspondência parcial entre o que cientista fez e aquilo que ele diz que fez.…”
Section: Correspondência Não-verbal E Verbal Fraude Científica E Poss...unclassified
“…Research should be headed both in quantitative as well as qualitative ways. [1][2][3] Every individual research scientist has his own ideas toward research. Each department has its own principle for research activities and motivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%