2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical trial registration in physiotherapy journals: Recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, only four of the included twelve trials had a pre-registered and publicly available trial protocol summary, and none had a public available full trial protocol. The processes of trial pre-registration and protocol publication could contribute to more detailed description of exercise interventions as trial protocol guidelines would refer to the above mentioned templates for reporting exercise characteristics 62,63 .…”
Section: Dose-responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, only four of the included twelve trials had a pre-registered and publicly available trial protocol summary, and none had a public available full trial protocol. The processes of trial pre-registration and protocol publication could contribute to more detailed description of exercise interventions as trial protocol guidelines would refer to the above mentioned templates for reporting exercise characteristics 62,63 .…”
Section: Dose-responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than one-third of the included trials were unregistered even at the time of article publication. Prospective registration of only 22% of included papers also suggests that adherence to the specific ICMJE, ISPJE and Declaration of Helsinki recommendations is not widespread (De Angelis et al 2004;World Medical Association 2008;Costa et al 2013). This prospective registration figure falls slightly short of that of 31% identified by Harriman and Patel (2016) in a search of all clinical trials published in the BMC series in 2013.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advantages conferred by appropriate randomised controlled trial (RCT) designs for minimising bias in individual studies, the value of this evidence to clinical practice can be undermined by other sources of bias. These include selective trial reporting, which may arise from researchers not submitting their work for peer-review or publishers not accepting a research report (De Angelis et al 2004;Costa et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations