20 anos da rPOT e o papel dos periódicos científicos na pandemia da COVID-19

A Avaliação por Pares em Periódicos Científicos

“…The debate on the quality and integrity of scientific production, which has been accentuated in recent years, has been associated with studies on the quality and relevance of scientific publications. That is, the ability of scientific journals to self-regulate themselves, especially in the conduct of an editorial process that promotes the evaluation of merit, originality, reliability of sources, data, analysis and results, theoretical foundation, and quality of scientific writing of manuscripts submitted to the appreciation of their editorial board and ad hoc reviewers (Cruz et al, 2021).…”

“…It involves the need for the collaboration of reviewers in terms of speed, and production of information relevant to the editorial decision regarding the manuscripts. This information is not always satisfactorily obtained (Cruz et al, 2021(Cruz et al, , 2020. There are other aspects to be considered when reviewing an article, such as the identification of theoretical-conceptual and writing weaknesses, the detection of methodological and statistical errors, and the identification of plagiarism (Botero, 2020;Mulligan, Hall, & Raphael, 2013).…”