2019
DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.20190064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delirium in cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This frequency is similar to previous reports on critically ill, but not terminally ill, patients with cancer requiring ICU care, which ranges from 22.9% to 39.3%. [22][23][24] It is also comparable with rates of delirium in ICU patients without cancer, which range from 20% to 80%. 9,28 In addition, we also found that patients with delirium had significantly higher ICU and hospital mortality compared with patients without delirium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This frequency is similar to previous reports on critically ill, but not terminally ill, patients with cancer requiring ICU care, which ranges from 22.9% to 39.3%. [22][23][24] It is also comparable with rates of delirium in ICU patients without cancer, which range from 20% to 80%. 9,28 In addition, we also found that patients with delirium had significantly higher ICU and hospital mortality compared with patients without delirium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…20 To date, there have been only four studies conducted on delirium in ICU patients with cancer who are not at the end of life. [21][22][23][24] These analyses also suffer from small sample size, have widely varying results, and lack indepth outcomes analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This frequency of delirium in this special population of critically but not terminally ill oncological ICU patients lies between those reported for general wards and palliative care units [8]. Very limited and controversial data have been available in this particular patient population so far [9,10,25]. The much higher delirium frequency of 95% observed by Almeida et al (n = 170) might be explained by three reasons: 1) by the divergent population of severely ill, mechanically ventilated patients; 2) by preventive measures including delirium monitoring, daily awakening trials and early mobilization implemented at the study hospital; 3) by patients in persistent coma or sedation until death without delirium screening potentially in uencing the frequency observed in the present study [9].…”
Section: Frequencymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Comparing oncological patients with and without delirium, sepsis occurred in 26/176 (15%) and 6/312 (1.9%) patients (p < 0.001), while shock was diagnosed in 30/176 (6.1%) and 6/312 (1.9%) patients, respectively (p < 0.001). The SAPS II in delirious and non-delirious patients with malignancy was 41 (27-68) and 24 (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), respectively (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Descriptive Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Medicamentos, como analgésicos e quimioterápicos, retirada da medicação, falta de oxigênio no sangue e outros distúrbios cerebrais podem ser algumas das causas (FUENTES et al, 2017;GOUVEIA;JOMAR;VALENTE, 2019). efeito adverso e sintomas extrapiramidais) e a quetiapina (possui hipotensão ortostática e sedação como efeitos adversos).…”
Section: Manejo Do Deliriumunclassified