Social Observatory as a new space for civil society and government relationships in Belém, Pará State, brazilian Amazon

Abstract

The article analyses the Social Observatory (SO) as a new arena for civil society, market and government dialogues and incidence on public policy. Specifically, the article examines the extent to which SO is an arena for a constructive dialogue to implement and to manage public policy for urban mobility at municipal level. It deals with the case of SO of Belém municipality, Pará State. Belém is the largest municipality in the Brazilian Amazon region in terms of population and socioeconomic structure for development. The paper shows that OS may constitute a significant participative arena which brings civil society and local government to take collective decision based on dialogue and transparency of information.­­­­ However, since it is a new organizational pattern, the OS still have many difficulties and challenges, whether of internal character, whether in its relation to other actors in the municipal public, private power and civil society.

Social Management in Public Institutions and its Possible Feedback Relationship with Organizational Climate: a Descriptive Review

“…However, studies that evaluated individuals involved in the decision-making process of public institutions through interviews have found some structural difficulties and especially, a greater need for transparency within the process (Bardal & Torres, 2020; Barros et al, 2019;Di Marco & Terceira, 2022;Faria et al, 2017;Zuccolotto & Teixeira, 2015). 8…”

“…Among the publications analyzed in this study, social management was conceptualized as a way of thinking about democracy and public management in a collective way, with greater inclusion of the population in decision-making processes, and not merely electoral, and which depends strictly on the commitment to transparency on the part of the institutions (Rocha, 2011;Zuccolotto & Teixeira, 2015). Thus, Social Management can be understood as collective decision-making, without coercion and based on transparency, intersubjectivity and dialogicity (Barros et al, 2019). Social observatories and monitoring programs were measures presented to encourage the maintenance of transparency (Barros et al, 2019;Di Marco & Terceira, 2022;Gonçalves et al, 2013).…”

“…Thus, Social Management can be understood as collective decision-making, without coercion and based on transparency, intersubjectivity and dialogicity (Barros et al, 2019). Social observatories and monitoring programs were measures presented to encourage the maintenance of transparency (Barros et al, 2019;Di Marco & Terceira, 2022;Gonçalves et al, 2013).…”