2013
DOI: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000500015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horizontal and vertical maxillary osteotomy stability, in cleft lip and palate patients, using allogeneic bone graft

Abstract: The use of allogeneic bone graft in cleft lip and palate patients submitted to Le Fort I osteotomy contributed to increase postoperative stability when compared to surgeries without bone graft.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of our additional finding was that bone grafting of the gap created by Le Fort I osteotomy had a protective effect on maxillary relapse, with an average of 1.723 mm less relapse compared to patients without bone grafting. This has been reported previously and should play a role in preoperative planning of the surgical intervention (Gomes et al, 2013;Eser et al, 2015). Our preferred choice for bone graft is autologous bone taken from either BSSO or maxillary osteotomy sites; however, cadaveric bone graft may also be used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…One of our additional finding was that bone grafting of the gap created by Le Fort I osteotomy had a protective effect on maxillary relapse, with an average of 1.723 mm less relapse compared to patients without bone grafting. This has been reported previously and should play a role in preoperative planning of the surgical intervention (Gomes et al, 2013;Eser et al, 2015). Our preferred choice for bone graft is autologous bone taken from either BSSO or maxillary osteotomy sites; however, cadaveric bone graft may also be used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The relapse tendency in CLP patients is influenced by intrinsic factors, such as scarring, muscle pull, tension in the soft tissues, the stability of bony fragments, and the severity of the maxillary hypoplasia 7,37,47,53 . In addition, treatment factors such as the presence or absence of interpositional bone grafting in LFI, use of different distraction devices in DO, and the occlusion achieved, all have an impact on the relapse tendency 5,7,[13][14][15]18,21,54 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, allogeneic bone grafts do not have the drawbacks of autografts, the procedure is more delicate and less successful in clinical practice. They also display several other disadvantages: risk of disease transmission of the donour site, infection, difficulties in obtaining and processing, possible rapid resorption [38,39], and partial loss of mechanical strength after sterilization [40]. Xenogenic bone substitutes of porcine, bovine, or, more recently, equine origin are used because of their chemical and structural composition similarity when compared to human bone [32].…”
Section: Autogenous Block Graftmentioning
confidence: 99%