2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-56762011000500005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho de genótipos de algodoeiro na presença ou não de rotação de cultura com Crotalaria spectabilis, em área infestada com Meloidogyne incognita

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Galbieri et al (2011) confirmed this assumptions studying the cultivar FM966LL in different locations, and finding susceptibility to RLS in Primavera do Leste MT and resistance in Ribeirão Preto SP. R. areola genotypic variation was also found by Pezenti et al (2013) studying fungi isolates from a cotton crop with three cultivars.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Galbieri et al (2011) confirmed this assumptions studying the cultivar FM966LL in different locations, and finding susceptibility to RLS in Primavera do Leste MT and resistance in Ribeirão Preto SP. R. areola genotypic variation was also found by Pezenti et al (2013) studying fungi isolates from a cotton crop with three cultivars.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Suinaga et al (2006) reported that the cultivars Delta Opal and BRS Cedro are the most common in the State of Mato Grosso, as they bring together high seed cotton productivity, fiber percentage, and phenotypic stability. However, other cultivars, such as Araça BRS, BRS Buriti, FMT 701, and NUOPAL are also widely cultivated as they have high yield potential (Galbieri et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, these environments vary substantially, and there are interactions between genotypes and environments (GE), that arise from differential genotypic responses to the environment. Understanding GE interactions affords an assessment of the real impact of selection and ensures greater reliability when recommending genotypes to maximize productivity and other agronomic traits of interest in a specific location or group of environments (Cruz et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they attract a great diversity of insects and natural enemies (Supriyadi, Wijayanti, Arniputri, Puspitarini, & Dwiyatno, 2019;Tavares et al, 2010). They are also able to control phytonematodes, benefiting antagonists and producing secondary compounds that are toxic or inhibitory to them, such as the monocrotaline pyrrolizidine alkaloids, which reduce the hatching of juveniles and motility (Galbieri, Fuzattoii, Ciaii, Welteri, & Fanan, 2011;Osei, Gowen, Pembroke, Brandenburg, & Jordan, 2010;Ratnadass, Fernandes, Avelino, & Habib, 2012;Santana et al, 2012). However, despite the literature demonstrating its nematicidal effect, the results presented here show that C. spectabilis maintained the highest and most stable number of viable EPNs on the 3rd day after inoculation, in relation to the other plants evaluated (Figure 2), with no effect on their infectivity (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%