2005
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-76922005000100005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to deal with negative publicity: the importance of consumer involvement

Abstract: Negative information about companies can have a harmful effect on consumer perceptions. However, few studies investigate how consumers process negative publicity and how companies should react to it. In order to examine this question, two experiments were carried out: first, a laboratory experiment which tests how consumers process two different types of negative publicity (product attributes or company values); second, a field experiment comparing three different responses (no answer, denial/reduction of offe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings also showed that the immoral behavior of public images and the expansion to a wider brand are conditioned by the choices of consumers' moral reasoning (Lee & Kwak, 2015). Therefore, the present finding that the rationalizing effect of moral rationalization is consistent with previous findings that consumers adjust negative information about the athlete when making a purchase decision (Bhattacharjee, Berman & Reed, 2013;Lee & Kwak, 2015;Bednall & Collings, 2000;Matos & Veiga, 2005;Funk & Pritchard, 2006;Kwak, Kim, Zimmerman, 2010;Lohneiss & Hill, 2014;Um, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Findings also showed that the immoral behavior of public images and the expansion to a wider brand are conditioned by the choices of consumers' moral reasoning (Lee & Kwak, 2015). Therefore, the present finding that the rationalizing effect of moral rationalization is consistent with previous findings that consumers adjust negative information about the athlete when making a purchase decision (Bhattacharjee, Berman & Reed, 2013;Lee & Kwak, 2015;Bednall & Collings, 2000;Matos & Veiga, 2005;Funk & Pritchard, 2006;Kwak, Kim, Zimmerman, 2010;Lohneiss & Hill, 2014;Um, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Involvement is the perceived personal relevance of a stimulus to an individual and the stimulus can be a product or service (Greenwald & Leavitt, 1984). Several studies have demonstrated the importance of involvement in consumer decision making and establish involvement as one of the principles of consumer behavior theory (Alves, Lopes, & Hernandez, 2017;Bloch & Richins, 1983;Liang, 2012;Matos & Veiga, 2005;Wu, Liu, & Hu, 2015). Emotions influence the relationship between CS and the client's contributions to the company.…”
Section: H2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a negative consumer reaction when the company or its employees deliver a poor service or product (Harris & Ogbonna, 2013;McColl-Kennedy, Sparks, & Nguyen, 2011;Santos & Fernandes, 2008). Consumers that receive any negative information from a third-party source about a product or service tend to have lower attitudes towards the company, especially when compared to those receiving no information at all (Matos & Veiga, 2005). A brand with a high number of complaints indicates a low level of satisfaction with a company's offering, diminishing the capacity to attract and retain customers and consequently, impacting the company's future expected cash flow BAR, Rio de Janeiro, v. 11, n. 3, art.…”
Section: The Non-linear Effect Of Complaintsmentioning
confidence: 99%