2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242004000400004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of instruction and motivation in the use of electric and manual toothbrushes in periodontal patients: a comparative study

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of manual and electric toothbrushes in plaque control in periodontal patients after proper instructions. Thirty six periodontal patients (mean age of 49 years, 21 females and 15 males) were included and completed the study (100% compliance). A single-blinded, randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical design was adopted, with the patients using during 2 periods of 14 days each the manual and/or electric toothbrush. Four subgroups of 9 individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…No additional articles were identified for full‐text reading from a hand search of the references. Ultimately 35 articles (31 in vivo articles 15,19,32‐60 and four in vitro articles 61‐64 ) were determined to meet all eligibility criteria and were designated for data extraction and analysis. Publications by McCracken et al 47 and Heasman et al 58 presented the results of the same clinical trial but separately reported on either the gingival‐abrasion or brushing‐force outcomes, respectively; thus, this single trial is listed in the in vivo secondary results tables (Table 5) and the surrogate safety‐parameter tables (Tables 2 and 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No additional articles were identified for full‐text reading from a hand search of the references. Ultimately 35 articles (31 in vivo articles 15,19,32‐60 and four in vitro articles 61‐64 ) were determined to meet all eligibility criteria and were designated for data extraction and analysis. Publications by McCracken et al 47 and Heasman et al 58 presented the results of the same clinical trial but separately reported on either the gingival‐abrasion or brushing‐force outcomes, respectively; thus, this single trial is listed in the in vivo secondary results tables (Table 5) and the surrogate safety‐parameter tables (Tables 2 and 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 A recent systematic review concluded that powered toothbrushes are superior to manual toothbrushes in terms of removing plaque and improving gingival health but it reported a high level of heterogeneity among the studies. 24,25 Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an intensive plaque control programme with sonic or manual supervised toothbrushing in improving clinical and patient-centred outcomes, and in reducing GCF levels of MMP-1 and MMP-9 in patients affected by DG due to OLP. It is known that the ability to achieve low plaque levels by oral hygiene efforts depends on oral hygiene motivation and frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entretanto, foi observado ainda que apesar da preferência pela escova elétrica, havia receio na utilização inicial desta, devido à sensação de risco de machucar a gengiva transmitida pela movimentação própria da escova. Roscher (2004) utilizou em seu estudo apenas um tipo de dentifrício em todos os voluntários, enquanto utilizamos dois tipos, sendo um destinado ao público infantil e outro destinado ao adulto, ficando a escolha a critério do voluntário. Contudo, os dentifrícios selecionados para o presente estudo, apresentavam características semelhantes em relação aos abrasivos de sua composição, para evitar alteração nos resultados.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified