2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2014.03.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of prostatic inflammation on LUTS and alpha blocker treatment outcomes

Abstract: ARTICLE INFO ______________________________________________________________ ______________________Purpose: To evaluate the association between prostatic inflammation and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to identify the effects of prostatic inflammation on the treatment with an alpha blocker. Materials and Methods:111 Participants who were aged ≥ 50 years, the presence of LUTS (maximal flow rate < 20 m/s, IPSS ≥ 11), and an elevated PSA level (3-20ng/mL) were treated with tamsulosin 0.2mg once daily for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this study did not distinguish between the effect of α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonists and 5ARIs. Another retrospective Korean study in 111 LUTS/BPH patients treated with the α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonist tamsulosin 0.2 mg/day for only 3 months indicated that the improvement in LUTS was independent of the inflammation grade [ 39 ]. However, multivariate analysis suggested that longer duration of treatment was associated with decreased symptomatic improvement (odds ratio 0.92; 95% CI 0.85–0.99).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study did not distinguish between the effect of α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonists and 5ARIs. Another retrospective Korean study in 111 LUTS/BPH patients treated with the α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonist tamsulosin 0.2 mg/day for only 3 months indicated that the improvement in LUTS was independent of the inflammation grade [ 39 ]. However, multivariate analysis suggested that longer duration of treatment was associated with decreased symptomatic improvement (odds ratio 0.92; 95% CI 0.85–0.99).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean change from baseline was 2.1 ± 7.9 ( P = 0.0767) in patients taking only BDP and 4.7 ± 7.9 ( P <.0001) in patients also taking SR. This may indicate a worsening of IPSS, especially in patients taking both treatments, although a temporary increase in score prior to final improvement is quite common in inflammations of the lower urinary tract [ 23 ]. In fact, IPSS is more accurate for the evaluation of voiding symptoms, whereas BDP is an anti-inflammatory medication and is therefore meant to act mainly on symptoms of the lower urinary tract defined as storage symptoms [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%