Organizações modernas e a burocracia: um a "afinidade eletiva"?

Matos, Fátima Regina Ney; Lima, Afonso Carneiro

doi:10.1590/s1676-56482007000200008

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Weber considers that rational domination (Cruz 1995, Giddens, 1997, Filleau & Marques-Ripoull, 2002 based on legal legitimacy (authority based on rule or norm and procedure) (Pimentel, 2012) would assume a increasing predominance and that would be translated into bureaucracy, in what Matos and Lima (2007) consider an "elective affinity". For Weber: "Bureaucratic administration means domination by the force of knowing: that is its fundamental character, specifically rational" (Cruz, 1995, 689).…”

Section: Bureaucracy For Max Webermentioning

confidence: 99%

The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber

Serpa¹,

Ferreira²

2019

IJSSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bureaucracy is a widely disseminated concept in Sociology and in Organisational Theory studies, and it currently has an image where negative aspects are often highlighted. However, for Max Weber, bureaucracy has very specific features that differ, in varied situations, from the representation and application often ascribed to this model of organisational administration. This review aims at contributing to putting forward the concept of bureaucracy as initially proposed by Max Weber, discussing it in its potentialities.

show abstract

Section: Bureaucracy For Max Webermentioning

confidence: 99%

The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber

Serpa¹,

Ferreira²

2019

IJSSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…-If it is too abstract [sic] or close to macrosociology, if it is too general, it explains everything, therefore it explains nothing, and its operative value is weak.Is too close to empirical data and concrete realities, it is not distinguished from historical narration, systematic description or orderly presentation of examples, and provides little understanding‖ (Schnapper, 2000, pp. 155-156)‖ It is in this logic that Weber considers rational domination (Weber, 1989b;Giddens, 1997;Filleau & Marques-Ripoull, 2002) based on legal legitimacy (Pimentel, 2012) and assumes an increasing predominance and translates into bureaucracy, in what Matos and Lima (2007) consider, paraphrasing Weber, an 'elective affinity', that is, the relations and tensions between ideas and interests (Gerth & Mills, 1982).…”

Section: Ideal Type Of Weber Bureaucracymentioning

confidence: 99%

Rationalization and Bureaucracy: Ideal-Type Bureaucracy by Max Weber

Ferreira

Serpa

2019

HSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of this study: This article intends to contribute to the discussion of the heuristic and analytical potentialities of the ideal type of bureaucracy proposed by Max Weber for the analysis of contemporary organizations. Methodology: For this essay, a bibliographical research was carried out on this topic, complemented by our experience as sociologists in teaching and research on the organizational theme in some databases, such as Web of Knowledge, DOAJ, SCIELO, and institutional repositories. Findings: For Max Weber, the bureaucracy presents very specific characteristics that differ, in varied situations, from the representation and application often conferred to this model of organizational administration. Implications: Bureaucracy is a notion with great social visibility and is associated with an image where negative aspects are emphasized. However, in discursive records of a scientific nature, bureaucracy is a relevant concept in Sociology and Organizational Theory studies.

show abstract

“…A administração puramente burocrática é, segundo toda a experiência, a forma mais racional de exercício de dominação, porque nela se alcança tecnicamente o máximo de rendimento em virtude de precisão, continuidade, disciplina, rigor e confiabilidade, ou seja, o alto rendimento justificado pelos meios de coerção e disciplina conforme o interesse predominante, além de intensidade e extensibilidade dos serviços e aplicabilidade formalmente universal a todas as espécies de tarefa (Weber, 1999;Matos & Lima, 2007).…”

Section: Burocracia E a Administração Públicaunclassified

Burocracia no Setor de Recursos Humanos de uma Autarquia

Pereira¹,

Silva²

2016

RASI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO:Recursos Humanos (RH) é a área responsável por organizar e produzir os processos de gestão de pessoas dos servidores públicos de uma Autarquia. Atualmente, a burocracia que norteia os procedimentos e regras na área de RH tem sido aplicada de maneira desatualizada em algumas instituições públicas no Brasil, causando alguns problemas que por sua vez interferem no andamento eficiente, prático e objetivo dos processos nos setores de RH. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo é analisar de maneira crítica e integrativa a burocracia no setor de recursos humanos de uma Autarquia Federal Brasileira vinculada ao Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI). Para isso, realiza-se um estudo de caso abordando um setor da Coordenação de Recursos Humanos desta Instituição. A tomada de decisão ou propostas de intervenção é baseada em estudo bibliográfico, confrontando com a observação da rotina do setor, incluindo os seus procedimentos executados. Após a identificação dos problemas administrativos do setor, que incluem principalmente processos desatualizados e formação acadêmica inadequada, a gestão por competências e por resultados são discutidas e propostas para orientar e ajustar os processos e fluxos de trabalho. Portanto, propõe-se neste trabalho ideias para uma flexibilidade de projetos, por meio da atualização dos fluxos de processos, que visem tornar mais eficiente o serviço público dentro do setor de recursos humanos da instituição, motivando, por conseguinte os servidores, e resultando na valorização e qualidade do trabalho do setor. Palavras-Chave: Burocracia, Gestão por Competências, Administração Pública. The Bureaucracy of the Human Resources Sector of Federal Autarchy Abstract:Human Resources (HR) is responsible to organize and perform the people management processes of the public employees of an autarchy. Nowadays, the bureaucracy that orients the procedures and rules in the HR field has been applied in a manner outdated in some public institutions in Brazil, causing some problems which interfere with the efficiency of processes in HR sectors. Thus, the aim this study was to analyze, critical and integrative way, the bureaucracy of the Human Resources sector of Brazilian Federal Institution linked to Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. It was performed a case study addressing one sector of the Coordination of Human Resources of Institution. The decision-making or intervention proposals were based on bibliographical study, comparing with the observation of the sector routine, including their procedures performed. After identifying the administrative problems of the sector, which mainly include outdated procedures and inadequate academic training, competence-based management approach and results-driven management model were discussed and suggested to guide and adjust the processes and workflows. Therefore, this paper proposes ideas for a flexibility of projects, by updating the process and workflows, to make more efficient the public service of the Human Resources sector of Institution, motivati...

show abstract

Organizações modernas e a burocracia: um a "afinidade eletiva"?

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber

The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber

Rationalization and Bureaucracy: Ideal-Type Bureaucracy by Max Weber

Burocracia no Setor de Recursos Humanos de uma Autarquia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About