2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-566x2009000400001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barcoding lepidoptera: current situation and perspectives on the usefulness of a contentious technique

Abstract: Barcoding Lepidoptera: Situação Atual e Perspectivas sobre a Utilidade de uma Técnica Controversa RESUMO -A necessidade crescente de identificação e delimitação de novas espécies, ou de espécies crípticas já estabelecidas, que estão sendo perdidas a uma taxa também crescente, tem levado diversos especialistas a utilizarem uma variedade de ferramentas moleculares e computacionais. Neste momento, taxonomistas devem estar atentos a toda nova tecnologia disponível na chamada "revolução dirigida pela tecnologia" na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study demonstrated the effectiveness of DNA barcodes for distinguishing H. armigera from H. zea (Table 2). The use of DNA barcodes has also succeeded in species-level identiÞcation for Ͼ50,000 species of Lepidoptera so far (Hebert et al 2004, Hajibabaei et al 2006, Burns et al 2008, Silva-Brandão et al 2009, Jinbo et al 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study demonstrated the effectiveness of DNA barcodes for distinguishing H. armigera from H. zea (Table 2). The use of DNA barcodes has also succeeded in species-level identiÞcation for Ͼ50,000 species of Lepidoptera so far (Hebert et al 2004, Hajibabaei et al 2006, Burns et al 2008, Silva-Brandão et al 2009, Jinbo et al 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several examples of inaccurate species assignments using DNA barcoding that identify potential limitations in the methodology (Elias et al 2007; Dasmahapatra et al 2010). These were associated with problems arising from incomplete barcode coverage of existing diversity, the apparent absence of consistent barcode gaps in certain taxa, and the potentially confounding effects of incomplete lineage sorting that can be difficult to assess (reviewed in Rubinoff et al 2006; Silva-Brandao et al 2009). However, the technique was successfully applied in a study where 150 lepidopteran specimens were correctly assigned using a barcode database of 200 closely allied species (Hebert et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA barcoding provides a very useful tool for species identification and species delimitation (Hebert et al 2003b(Hebert et al , 2010Dincã et al 2011;Goldstein & DeSalle 2011;Teletchea 2010;Hausmann et al 2011Hausmann et al , 2013Puillandre et al 2011;Strutzenberger et al 2011;Mutanen et al 2012;Laiho & Ståhls 2013;Nagy et al 2013), and is especially valuable for associating extreme forms, sexes and different stages of the life cycle of organisms (Miller et al 2005;Hausmann & Parra 2009;Silva-Brandão et al 2009;Jinbo et al 2011;Li et al 2011). DNA barcodes may be potentially useful for studying trophic links in complex field scenarios (Valentini et al 2009), as in the case of webs involving host-parasitoid interactions, where many times host identification must be performed using immature stages (Hrcek et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%