2011
DOI: 10.1673/031.011.15401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of DNA Barcodes to Identify Invasive ArmywormSpodopteraSpecies in Florida

Abstract: A critical component for sustaining adequate food production is the protection of local agriculture from invasive pest insects. Essential to this goal is the ability to accurately distinguish foreign from closely related domestic species, a process that has traditionally required identification using diagnostic morphological “keys” that can be both subtle and labor-intensive. This is the case for the Lepidopteran group of insects represented by Spodoptera, a genus of Noctuidae “armyworm” moths that includes se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, aside from enabling the early detection of invasive species (Onah et al 2015), DNA barcoding can reveal source regions (Bellis et al 2015) and introduction patterns (Blacket et al 2015). Nagoshi et al (2011) used it to moni-tor introductions of the invasive armyworm species, Spodoptera litura and S. littoralis, into Florida, while Tyagi et al (2015) and Wei et al (2010) detected the first invasions of Thrips parvispinus and Echinothrips americanus in India and China, repectively. In a similar fashion, DNA barcoding differentiated Heliothis armigera from the native H. zea, revealing the spread of the former species after its introduction into Brazil (Mastrangelo et al 2014).…”
Section: Quarantine Of Invasive Alien Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, aside from enabling the early detection of invasive species (Onah et al 2015), DNA barcoding can reveal source regions (Bellis et al 2015) and introduction patterns (Blacket et al 2015). Nagoshi et al (2011) used it to moni-tor introductions of the invasive armyworm species, Spodoptera litura and S. littoralis, into Florida, while Tyagi et al (2015) and Wei et al (2010) detected the first invasions of Thrips parvispinus and Echinothrips americanus in India and China, repectively. In a similar fashion, DNA barcoding differentiated Heliothis armigera from the native H. zea, revealing the spread of the former species after its introduction into Brazil (Mastrangelo et al 2014).…”
Section: Quarantine Of Invasive Alien Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unrooted phylogenetic tree was derived using the Tamura-Nei genetic distance model (Tamura and Nei 1993) and unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic average analysis (Sneath and Sokal 1973), with conÞdence assessed by bootstrapping at 1,000ϫ repetition. Spodoptera species are represented by consensus sequences derived from Nagoshi et al (2011). Only conÞdence values above 75% are indicated and nodes below 70% are collapsed.…”
Section: Association Of Strain Markers With Plant Hostsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These species have well-adapted different agro-ecological zones around the globe from Asia to Africa to Europe (Zhang et al 2015). They are polyphagous pests with a wide range of host plants including: cotton, maize, gram, sesame, okra, tomato, potato, and many other fruit and vegetable crops (Aggarwal et al 2006;Nagoshi et al 2011). Nevertheless, due to blind and extensive use of pesticides, these and other lepidopterous pest species have developed resistance to almost all groups of pesticides including organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids (Kranthi et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%