2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0085-56262014000200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey identification in nests of the potter wasp Hypodynerus andeus (Packard) (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) using DNA barcodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The host plant record here provided suggests that the larva was captured by a female of H. andeus on S. areira trees growing there. Furthermore, the similarity of the two DNA barcodes of C. cortesi (MW911318, MW911319) was 99.7 and 100% with that of an unidentified larva of Geometridae (KF663055) collected in a cell of H. andeus in the type locality of C. cortesi (Vargas et al, 2014). This finding corroborates that larvae of C. cortesi are captured by females of H. andeus to fill their cells.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The host plant record here provided suggests that the larva was captured by a female of H. andeus on S. areira trees growing there. Furthermore, the similarity of the two DNA barcodes of C. cortesi (MW911318, MW911319) was 99.7 and 100% with that of an unidentified larva of Geometridae (KF663055) collected in a cell of H. andeus in the type locality of C. cortesi (Vargas et al, 2014). This finding corroborates that larvae of C. cortesi are captured by females of H. andeus to fill their cells.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The stress caused to hemlocks by the hemlock wooly adelgid was reflected in a rise of hemlock borers as a proportion of prey captured by the wasp. This has been shown for other solitary hunting wasps as well viz, Hypodynerus andeus (Packard) (Vargas et al 2014) and Sphex ichneumoneus (L.) (Brockmann 1985). Both species specialize in a family of prey, but prey choice is constrained by habitat, size of prey, and phenology, and like C. fumipennis, composition of collected prey fluctuates with prey abundance.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…TA B L E 2 (Continued) makes it extremely difficult to identify prey morphologically without witnessing the foraging process directly (Gambino, 1986;Sackmann et al, 2000). Compared to previous morphological techniques for prey identification, DNA barcoding has shown a higher identification rate of over 90% (Goldstein & DeSalle, 2011;Hausmann et al, 2011;Hebert, Cywwinska, et al, 2003;Hebert, Ratnasingham, et al, ;Kasper et al, 2004;Nagy et al, 2013;Vargas et al, 2014;Ward & Ramón-Laca, 2013). However, DNA barcoding still has some limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these difficulties, there have recently been efforts to use the bioinformatics technique of DNA barcode analysis to track the prey spectra of predators through DNA sequence matching with public databases, such as GenBank. These methods show a far higher identification rate than previous morphological methods (Vargas, Vargas‐Ortiz, Huanca‐Mamani, & Hausmann, ; Goldstein & DeSalle, ; Hausmann, Haszprunar, & Hebert, ; Hebert, Cywwinska, Ball, & Waard, ; Hebert, Ratnasingham, & de Waard, ; Nagy, Sonet, Mortelmans, Vandewynkel, & Grootaert, ; Kasper et al, ; Ward & Ramón‐Laca, ; Do & Choi, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%