2001
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-566x2001000400028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seletividade de Inseticidas a Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) e ao Predador Doru luteipes (Scudder) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae)

Abstract: Insecticide Selectivity to Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and the Predator Doru luteipes (Scudder) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae)ABSTRACT -The objective of this work was to study the selectivity of the insecticides acephate, deltamethrin, dimethoate, methamidophos, methyl parathion, and pirimicarb to first, second, and third instar nymphs and adults of the predator Doru luteipes (Scudder) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) in comparison with last instar nymphs of the prey Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences for adult parasitoid (Table 1) Table 1 Impact of glyphosate and chlorpyrifos commercial products on parasitism activity and viability of Telenomus remus adults (emerged from non-treated pupae) directly exposed to dry residue on inert substrate 1 and 2 days after parasitoid emergence (DAE) (25 ± 2°C, 70 ± 10% RH, photoperiod of 14:10 h L/D). are probably due to the fact that, at this stage of development, the insect is more susceptible to pesticides when exposed to contamination by contact when moving on treated surfaces (Hassan 1992, Bacci et al 2001. Differently, the pupa is protected inside the chorion of the host egg and is usually reported as more tolerant to chemicals (Hassan 1992) if compared to the adult stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences for adult parasitoid (Table 1) Table 1 Impact of glyphosate and chlorpyrifos commercial products on parasitism activity and viability of Telenomus remus adults (emerged from non-treated pupae) directly exposed to dry residue on inert substrate 1 and 2 days after parasitoid emergence (DAE) (25 ± 2°C, 70 ± 10% RH, photoperiod of 14:10 h L/D). are probably due to the fact that, at this stage of development, the insect is more susceptible to pesticides when exposed to contamination by contact when moving on treated surfaces (Hassan 1992, Bacci et al 2001. Differently, the pupa is protected inside the chorion of the host egg and is usually reported as more tolerant to chemicals (Hassan 1992) if compared to the adult stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O método de aplicação no foco do ataque, e não na área total do talhão, bem como o fato de os ovos endofíticos de L. heveae não sofrerem influência das pulverizações, possivelmente sejam os fatores determinantes para garantir a manutenção da população do parasitoide na área, o que explicaria as altas taxas de parasitismo observadas. Os produtos fitossanitários aplicados não se demonstraram seletivos a outras espécies de predadores e parasitoides (Gusmão et al, 2000;Bacci et al,. 2001;Perioto et al, 2002) e, provavelmente, não os seriam a E. tingitiphagus.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Exemplares das vespas estudadas foram coletadas, montadas e identificadas no Museu de Entomologia da UFV. Para instalação dos bioensaios, folhas de café da cultivar Catuaí foram imersas em caldas inseticidas por cinco segundos (Bacci et al 2001, Galvan et al 2002. As folhas foram postas para secar à sombra em um varal por duas horas.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified