Anthony Giddens e as políticas da mudança climática

Raizer, Leandro

doi:10.1590/s1517-45222011000100014

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Discourse analysis refers to the study of the social consequences brought by subject's narration and the way of narration [31,32]. Foucault' s discourse analysis is the specific language patterns intertwined with social power and an activity between the speaker and the receiver through text or communication in a specific social context [37]. This shows that discourse can be reflected in the text, representing the attention of knowledge producers to a certain field of society in the process of communication.…”

Section: Measuring Aed and Dedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China

Li²

2020

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From the discourse analysis perspective, ecopolitics has experienced a discourse change from authoritarianism to democracy. This study uses theory of authoritarianism and democracy in ecopolitics to explore the impact of authoritarian ecopolitical discourse (AED) and democratic ecopolitical discourse (DED) on environmental quality in China. After analysis using panel data and comparison of three main regions, results suggest a negative relationship between AED of the central government and environmental quality. By contrast, a positive relationship exists between AED of local governments and environmental quality. A positive relationship exists between DED, which measures the proposals of People's Congress deputies and Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), and environmental quality. Nevertheless, the positive effect of DED is weaker than that of AED. The impact is also different among the regions. Our interpretations are as follows. China's current governance mechanism is a top-down decision-making mechanism, rather than a bottom-up information transmission mechanism. The concentration of power keeps decisionmaking power and resources away from levels with considerably accurate information and capabilities in problem solving. Therefore, we suggest that governments should change their decision-making process and exert effort to be transparent to the entire society. A bottom-up mechanism of information collection and transmission should be established, such as environmental inspection mechanism and checking on cadres' achievements with green GDP.

show abstract

Section: Measuring Aed and Dedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China

Li²

2020

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Anthony Giddens e as políticas da mudança climática

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China

Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About