2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132003000400010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effect of glucagon and isoproterenol on hepatic glycogenolysis and glycolysis in isolated perfused liver

Abstract: The effect of glucagon and isoproterenol (ß-adrenergic agonist) on hepatic glycogenolysis and glycolysis in isolated perfused liver was compared. The levels of isoproterenol and glucagon which promoted the maximal activation of glycogenolysis were 20 µM and 1nM respectively. However, glucagon (1 nM) not only increased glycogenolysis but also inhibited glycolysis. Because adenosine-3'-5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) is a common second messenger to glucagon and isoproterenol, the level of cAMP that simulates the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because post receptor mechanisms are important in regulating liver response to glucagon and isoprorenol in terms of glycogen catabolism, 26 we employed cyanide, a respiratory chain inhibitor, which bypasses membrane receptors to activate glycogenolysis and glycolysis. Thus, in contrast with glucagon and isoproterenol, the responsiveness of glycogen breakdown in the livers of IIH rats infused with cyanide remained unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because post receptor mechanisms are important in regulating liver response to glucagon and isoprorenol in terms of glycogen catabolism, 26 we employed cyanide, a respiratory chain inhibitor, which bypasses membrane receptors to activate glycogenolysis and glycolysis. Thus, in contrast with glucagon and isoproterenol, the responsiveness of glycogen breakdown in the livers of IIH rats infused with cyanide remained unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously reported 26 that the effect of the infusion of glucagon and isoproterenol on activation of glycogenolysis during IIH was mediated, partly at least, by cAMP and the concentration of cAMP necessary to simulate the effect of glucagon on glycogenolysis was greater than that necessary to simulate the effects of isoproterenol. Therefore, we can suggest that the infused glucagon was capable of inducing higher intracellular concentrations of cAMP compared with isoproterenol, and for this reason glucagon was less influenced by the intensification of cAMP catabolism promoted by insulin through activation of phosphodiesterase 3B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each reaction we specified the initial concentration c of reactants , the probability p to occur and the time t (see parameter t in Equation (2)) between two subsequent events of product formation. These parameters were estimated accordingly to literature data [5,22,23,27,34]. In particular t is estimated A reaction pathway for the glycogen breakdown (taken from [5] and https://files.nyu.edu/gcl1/public/).…”
Section: The Glycogen Breakdown Pathway: a Model Of Intracellular Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each mode of simulation, we use the lower, medium and upper limit of the molar concentration of the variables: InfLim, MedLim, MaxLim, respectively. Adapted from [5,22,23,27,34].…”
Section: A Glycogen Breakdown Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rigorous glycemic control has been related with an increased incidence of insulin induced hypoglycemia (IIH) which is the major obstacle to the implementation of the intensive treatment (Davis and Alonso, 2004). On the other hand, considering that glucagon, the most important gluconeogenic (Bracht et al, 2002) and glycogenolytic hormone (Vardanega-Peicher et al, 2003) is very expensive and has less availability, glucose is the main antidote to treat IIH (Moore and Woollard, 2005). However, previous studies (Souza et al, 2001a,b) have shown that a single intraperitoneal (ip) administration of glucose during IIH did not promote glycemia recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%