Processamento auditivo em teste e reteste: confiabilidade da avaliação

Frascá, Maria Fernanda Simões dos Santos; Lobo, Ivone Ferreira Neves; Schochat, Eliane

doi:10.1590/s1516-80342011000100009

Cited by 11 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The absence of a pattern of specific responses for each group made it difficult to compare the groups. This type of performance was also observed by Berwanger et al (23) and Frascá (24) in evaluations of control groups by testing and retesting.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

How auditory temporal processing deficits relate to dyslexia

Murphy

Schochat

2009

Braz J Med Biol Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies have shown that dyslexic children present a deficiency in the temporal processing of auditory stimuli applied in rapid succession. However, discussion continues concerning the way this deficiency can be influenced by temporal variables of auditory processing tests. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to analyze by auditory temporal processing tests the effect of temporal variables such as interstimulus intervals, stimulus duration and type of task on dyslexic children compared to a control group. Of the 60 children evaluated, 33 were dyslexic (mean age = 10.5 years) and 27 were normal controls (mean age = 10.8 years). Auditory processing tests assess the abilities of discrimination and ordering of stimuli in relation to their duration and frequency. Results showed a significant difference in the average accuracy of control and dyslexic groups considering each variable (interstimulus intervals: 47.9 ± 5.5 vs 37.18 ± 6.0; stimulus duration: 61.4 ± 7.6 vs 50.9 ± 9.0; type of task: 59.9 ± 7.9 vs 46.5 ± 9.0) and the dyslexic group demonstrated significantly lower performance in all situations. Moreover, there was an interactive effect between the group and the duration of stimulus variables for the frequency-pattern tests, with the dyslexic group demonstrating significantly lower results for short durations (53.4 ± 8.2 vs 48.4 ± 11.1), as opposed to no difference in performance for the control group (62.2 ± 7.1 vs 60.6 ± 7.9). These results support the hypothesis that associates dyslexia with auditory temporal processing, identifying the stimulus-duration variable as the only one that unequally influenced the performance of the two groups.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

How auditory temporal processing deficits relate to dyslexia

Murphy

Schochat

2009

Braz J Med Biol Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, prior studies also demonstrated the efficacy of AT in children with APD (4,(7)(8)(9)12,13) . The tests used in this study were considered stable by test-retest studies that involved individuals with typical development (26) . Consequently, changes in performance suggest modifications in the auditory system and its functions as consequence of cellular reorganization promoted by lesioninduced compensation, stimulation-induced learning, or natural system maturation (6) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manutenção das habilidades auditivas pós treinamento auditivo

Filippini

Brito

Neves-Lobo

et al. 2014

Audiol., Commun. Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo Verificar a eficácia do Treinamento Auditivo e a manutenção das habilidades auditivas treinadas após um, dois, ou três anos do seu término, com o intuito de comprovar a eficácia do treino em longo prazo. Métodos Dez crianças com alteração do processamento auditivo - graus variando entre leve a moderado, moderado e moderado a severo - passaram por um programa de treinamento auditivo de oito semanas e foram reavaliadas imediatamente após o treino (PÓS-1) e um, dois, ou três anos depois (PÓS-2). Resultados Foram observadas diferenças significativas no desempenho médio, entre a avaliação pré-treino e as avaliações PÓS-1 e PÓS-2, sem diferenças entre as duas últimas. Não foram observadas correlações entre o intervalo de tempo entre PÓS-1 e PÓS-2 e a diferença no desempenho dessas avaliações. Em PÓS-1, a maioria das avaliações apresentou-se dentro da normalidade, ou com alterações leves do PA, sendo que 60% dos indivíduos mantiveram tais resultados em PÓS-2. Conclusão Verificamos, neste estudo, que o Treinamento Auditivo é eficaz na intervenção dos Transtornos do Processamento Auditivo e que os benefícios obtidos após o treinamento se mantêm, mesmo após um, dois, ou três anos do seu término.

show abstract

“…The tests used in this research are considered to be stable, proven in test-retest study 22 . Thus, changes in their responses suggest modifications on the auditory system and functions, as a consequence of the cell reorganization generated by the sound amplification, by auditory learning induced by training, or yet, by the natural maturation of the system 19,23 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory rehabilitation in adults: results of a training program

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to describe the findings of the auditory processing behavioral tests in patients with hearing loss before and after hearing aid fitting associated with auditory training. Methods: a descriptive analytical study that compared the findings of the auditory processing evaluation in 22 patients, from 19 to 62 years old, with mild or moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Tests used: Sound localization; Masking Level Difference; Alternate Disyllables Dichotic Listening Test; Melodic Frequency Pattern Test, Melodic Duration Pattern Test; Gaps in Noise; Speech in Noise Test. After the first tests, the patients were fitted with hearing aids and underwent eight auditory training sessions. The tests were retaken after a two-month period. Results: there was a predominance of females and a moderate degree hearing loss. In the comparison of the initial and final assessment situations, a statistically significant difference (p <0.05) was seen in all conditions studied, except for the Gaps in Noise and Masking Level Difference tests. Conclusion: the results have proven that the auditory training performed in adult users of hearing aids brought about significant improvements on the auditory processing skills, thus, modifying their auditory behavior. The improvement of the results of the auditory processing behavioral tests in the initial and final situations reflects the hearing functional improvement achieved.

show abstract

Processamento auditivo em teste e reteste: confiabilidade da avaliação

Cited by 11 publications

References 7 publications

How auditory temporal processing deficits relate to dyslexia

How auditory temporal processing deficits relate to dyslexia

Manutenção das habilidades auditivas pós treinamento auditivo

Auditory rehabilitation in adults: results of a training program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About