2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-635x2011000100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of dietary non-phytate phosphorous levels and phytase supplementation on the performance and bone characteristics of broilers

Abstract: Precise phosphorus nutrition is important for significant reductions in both P pollution and ration costs. The influence of different levels (%) of dietary nPP fed from 0 to 20 d (0.45, 0.40, 0.35, 0.30, 0.25, compared with feeding 0.20 nPP with and without 500 F.T.U. of phytase per kg of diet) and from 21 to 36 d of age (0.414, 0.364, 0.314, 0.264, 0.214, compared with 0.164 nPP with and without 500 F.T.U. of phytase per kg of diet) were evaluate using a total of 588 day-old commercial broiler chicks. Each t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
9
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
9
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bone ash percentage is another commonly used criterion for estimating dietary NPP requirements of broilers. In the present study, the optimal dietary NPP level required to obtain the optimal tibia ash percentage was estimated to be 0.29% based on the broken-line model, which was lower than those reported by Yan et al (2001), Dhandu and Angel (2003), Karimi et al (2011) and also recommended by NRC (1994). Although tibia ash percentage is a sensitive criterion for NPP requirement evaluation (Dhandu and Angel, 2003), it is inevitable to slaughter birds for tibia sample collection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Bone ash percentage is another commonly used criterion for estimating dietary NPP requirements of broilers. In the present study, the optimal dietary NPP level required to obtain the optimal tibia ash percentage was estimated to be 0.29% based on the broken-line model, which was lower than those reported by Yan et al (2001), Dhandu and Angel (2003), Karimi et al (2011) and also recommended by NRC (1994). Although tibia ash percentage is a sensitive criterion for NPP requirement evaluation (Dhandu and Angel, 2003), it is inevitable to slaughter birds for tibia sample collection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…In recent years, broken-line models have been often used for estimating dietary NPP requirements of broilers (Waldroup et al, 2000;Yan et al, 2001;Karimi et al, 2011). Therefore, in the present study, dietary NPP requirements of broilers have been evaluated by broken-line models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations