2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982010000700005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum contribution selection using differential evolution

Abstract: -A program to determine optimum contribution selection using differential evolution was developed. The objective function to be optimized was composed by the expected merit of the future progeny and the coancestry among selected parents. Simulated and real datasets of populations with overlapping generations were used to validate and test the performance of the program. The program was computationally efficient and feasible for practical applications. The expected consequences of using the program, in contrast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
18
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the operational constraints can be modeled directly using semidefinite programming, which may provide slightly higher gains at the cost of a more complex problem formulation (Pong-Wong and Woolliams 2007;Ahlinder et al 2014). A different strategy is to leave the strict constrained optimization framework and maximize a weighted index that balances genetic gain and inbreeding (Carvalheiro et al 2010;Clark et al 2013). Optimizing this simple index with general purpose metaheuristics, such as a differential evolution algorithm (Storn and Price 1997), allows us to easily accommodate alternative or additional objectives, trading optimality of solutions for flexibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the operational constraints can be modeled directly using semidefinite programming, which may provide slightly higher gains at the cost of a more complex problem formulation (Pong-Wong and Woolliams 2007;Ahlinder et al 2014). A different strategy is to leave the strict constrained optimization framework and maximize a weighted index that balances genetic gain and inbreeding (Carvalheiro et al 2010;Clark et al 2013). Optimizing this simple index with general purpose metaheuristics, such as a differential evolution algorithm (Storn and Price 1997), allows us to easily accommodate alternative or additional objectives, trading optimality of solutions for flexibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para testes de viabilidade em aplicações práticas foi usado o conjunto de dados reais dos animais do rebanho Nelore, onde foram selecionados 100 touros e 500 fêmeas para reprodução (acasalamento). Uma das conclusões contidas no trabalhoé que o programa desenvolvido mostrou-se computacionalmente eficiente e viável para aplicações práticas [2].…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified
“…Diante disso, Cavalheiro et al (2010), sugerem que direcionar os acasalamentos sem comprometer o mérito predito da progênie e, inclusive, a combinação de acasalamento com restrição sobre endogamia pode proporcionar maior progresso genético que o acasalamento aleatório.…”
Section: Acasalamentounclassified
“…Nesse sentido, Neves et al (2009) Apesar do potencial do método dos AGs, ao que se constatou na literatura consultada, a viabilidade do uso na seleção de animais foi investigada em somente com uso de evolução diferencial (LEE et al, 2008;CAVALHEIRO et al, 2010;KINGHORN, 2011). As teorias e hipóteses de utilização da SANTOS, N.P.S.…”
Section: Otimização No Melhoramento Genético Animalunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation