2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982008000100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho, eficiência de utilização dos nutrientes e estrutura do trato digestório de pintos de corte alimentados na fase pré-inicial com rações de diferentes formas físicas

Abstract: RESUMO -Este estudo foi realizado com o objetivo de avaliar o efeito da forma física da ração sobre o desempenho, a utilização dos nutrientes das rações e o desenvolvimento do trato disgestório de pintos de corte na primeira semana de vida.Foram utilizados 150 pintos machos Cobb distribuídos ao acaso em três tratamentos com cinco repetições de dez aves. Os tratamentos consistiram das formas físicas farelada, triturada e peletizada de uma ração pré-inicial comercial. Com exceção da moela, os órgãos do trato dig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical form of pre-start diet (1-7 days) influences the performance of broilers until the end of the initial phase (8-21 days old), but the effects diminish until slaughter age with no effect on carcass characteristics (Freitas et al, 2009). Several studies are in line with the increase of broiler performance when processed diets are offered, which is mostly explained both by improvements in weight gain and feed conversion (Jones et al, 1995;Scott et al, 1997;Leeson et al, 1999;Lecznieski et al, 2001;Vargas et al, 2001;Greenwood et al, 2004;Silva et al, 2004;Maiorka et al, 2005;Lara et al, 2008); development of the digestive tract (Shamoto & Yamauchi, 2000; Feeding Behaviour of Broiler Chickens: a Review on the Biomechanical Characteristics Engberg et al, 2002;Dahlke et al, 2003;Zang et al, 2009); increasing of feed density leading both to nutrient intake and to growth rate (Engberg et al, 2002;McKinney & Teeter 2004;Lemme et al, 2006;Freitas et al, 2008;Meurer et al, 2008;Freitas et al, 2009); greater nutrient digestibility (Moreira et al, 1994;Vargas et al, 2001;Goodband et al, 2002;Freitas et al, 2008;Zang et al, 2009); reduction on particles selectivity by the birds and better palatability (Gadzirayi et al, 2006;Lara et al, 2008); minimization of energy expenditure during feeding (Nir, et al, 1994c;Leeson et al, 1999;Jensen, 2000;López et al, 2007); decreasing of wastage (Jensen, 2000;…”
Section: Feeding Behaviour Of Broiler Chickens: a Review On The Biomementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The physical form of pre-start diet (1-7 days) influences the performance of broilers until the end of the initial phase (8-21 days old), but the effects diminish until slaughter age with no effect on carcass characteristics (Freitas et al, 2009). Several studies are in line with the increase of broiler performance when processed diets are offered, which is mostly explained both by improvements in weight gain and feed conversion (Jones et al, 1995;Scott et al, 1997;Leeson et al, 1999;Lecznieski et al, 2001;Vargas et al, 2001;Greenwood et al, 2004;Silva et al, 2004;Maiorka et al, 2005;Lara et al, 2008); development of the digestive tract (Shamoto & Yamauchi, 2000; Feeding Behaviour of Broiler Chickens: a Review on the Biomechanical Characteristics Engberg et al, 2002;Dahlke et al, 2003;Zang et al, 2009); increasing of feed density leading both to nutrient intake and to growth rate (Engberg et al, 2002;McKinney & Teeter 2004;Lemme et al, 2006;Freitas et al, 2008;Meurer et al, 2008;Freitas et al, 2009); greater nutrient digestibility (Moreira et al, 1994;Vargas et al, 2001;Goodband et al, 2002;Freitas et al, 2008;Zang et al, 2009); reduction on particles selectivity by the birds and better palatability (Gadzirayi et al, 2006;Lara et al, 2008); minimization of energy expenditure during feeding (Nir, et al, 1994c;Leeson et al, 1999;Jensen, 2000;López et al, 2007); decreasing of wastage (Jensen, 2000;…”
Section: Feeding Behaviour Of Broiler Chickens: a Review On The Biomementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Physical analyses involved weighing 300 g (± 20 g) of the sample for further cascade screen-tance (Abdollahi et al, 2013). The supply of pelleted or mash feed for broiler chicks in the initial phase allows greater consumption, metabolization and retention of energy intake (Freitas et al, 2008), as well as improves nutrient digestibility and reduces feeding time, which favors weight gain (Engberg et al, 2002). Pellet integrity indexes of 60-64 % may result higher feed conversion, greater weight gain and better feed efficiency of broiler chickens (Mckinney & Teeter, 2004;Corzo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Laboratory Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of villi is associated with the enterocytes of the villi, and their size increase reflects a greater absorption of food (MACARI; MAIORKA, 2000). Freitas et al (2008) reported that most villus height is related to performance results, and that poultry with larger villi have higher weight gains and better feed conversion. Thus, the larger the size of the villi, the greater the ability of digestion and absorption of nutrients, due to the larger contact area and the level of enzyme effectiveness between the mucosa and intestinal lumen.…”
Section: =098mentioning
confidence: 99%