Self-efficacy scale for Brazilians with type 1 diabetes

Gastal, Daniela Alves; Pinheiro, Ricardo Tavares; Vazquez, Débora Potter

doi:10.1590/s1516-31802007000200006

Cited by 17 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is because users tend to agree or disagree with a given question without, however, being able to quantify the intensity of such agreement or disagreement. This confirms observations in previous studies and it suggests the need to adapt the scale to three options 10 - 12 , 21 . However, the number of categories of the scale in this study was kept to five so that the results of the DES-SF application were comparable to studies in other countries 2 , 3 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…There are different instruments in the literature that assess empowerment in diabetes 10 , 17 , 22 . However, the Escala de Autoeficácia em Diabetes – Versão Curta (EAD-VC) stands out for its ease and feasibility of application.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The DES-SF stands out among the instruments that evaluate empowerment in diabetes 10 , 17 , being effective, brief, practical and quickly administered. It can be implemented through telephone call to a large number of users, before and after an educational intervention 2 , 3 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale – Short Form

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE To translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the Diabetes Empowerment Scale – Short Form for assessment of psychosocial self-efficacy in diabetes care within the Brazilian cultural context.METHODS Assessment of the instrument’s conceptual equivalence, as well as its translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed following international standards. The Expert Committee’s assessment of the translated version was conducted through a web questionnaire developed and applied via the web tool e-Surv. The cross-culturally adapted version was used for the pre-test, which was carried out via phone call in a group of eleven health care service users diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The pre-test results were examined by a group of experts, composed by health care consultants, applied linguists and statisticians, aiming at an adequate version of the instrument, which was subsequently used for test and retest in a sample of 100 users diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus via phone call, their answers being recorded by the web tool e-Surv. Internal consistency and reproducibility of analysis were carried out within the statistical programming environment R.RESULTS Face and content validity were attained and the Brazilian Portuguese version, entitled Escala de Autoeficácia em Diabetes – Versão Curta, was established. The scale had acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.634 (95%CI 0.494– 0.737), while the correlation of the total score in the two periods was considered moderate (0.47). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.50.CONCLUSIONS The translated and cross-culturally adapted version of the instrument to spoken Brazilian Portuguese was considered valid and reliable to be used for assessment within the Brazilian population diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The use of a web tool (e-Surv) for recording the Expert Committee responses as well as the responses in the validation tests proved to be a reliable, safe and innovative method.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale – Short Form

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, most of the studies lacked a methodological basis for determining sample size. Sample size was calculated in only five of the 26 studies (19,38,(41)(42)(43), which may have modified the psychometric data and constitutes an increased risk of bias. Also, during the data extraction phase, there were some difficulties in extracting certain information due to lack of clarity in the descriptions of the methodological processes.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diabetes-Specific Questionnaires Validated in Brazilian Portuguese: A Systematic Review

Bottino¹,

Madalosso²,

Garcia³

et al. 2020

Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two researchers conducted independent searches on five different electronic databases: PubMed/ MEDLINE, Embase, SciELO, LiLACS and Web of Science. Studies were selected that covered crosscultural adaptation methodology and validation in Brazil with type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients of any age. After reading the full-text articles, data related to psychometric characteristics were extracted from each study selected. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α (Cα). The initial searches identified 2,211 studies. After exclusions, 26 were included, covering a total of 31 questionnaires. Questionnaires were grouped into 11 domains based on their main focus of interest: adherence (n = 8), quality of life (n = 7), diabetes knowledge (n = 3), hypoglycemia (n = 3), self-efficacy (n = 3), satisfaction with pharmaceutical services (n = 1), emotional stress (n = 2), hope (n = 1), attitude towards diabetes (n = 1), perception of disease severity (n=1), and risk of developing diabetes (n = 1). This study identified and reviewed all of the diabetes-specific questionnaires that have been validated for Brazilian Portuguese, which should facilitate selection of the most appropriate instrument for each domain of interest in future research and clinical settings. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(2):111-20

show abstract

“…This alteration of data gathering technique has been performed elsewhere with no harms to participants or the instrument psychometric performance. 17 To estimate the sample size, data from a pilot study among 20 subjects were used. Then sample size was calculated based on the Pearson correlation coefficient, considering as the null hypothesis, correlation coefficient = 0 (zero), α = 0.05 and β = 88%.…”

Section: Sample Selection and Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric performance of the Brazilian version the “Insulin Management Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale” for patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Pedrosa¹,

Trevisan²,

Nascimento³

et al. 2018

Medicina (Ribeirao Preto. Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Model of study: Validation study. Objective: To evaluate the psychometric performance of the Brazilian version of the Insulin Management Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale - IMDSES. Methodology: Reliability (internal consistency - Cronbach’s α), convergent and criterion validity were assessed. Data were gathered from 127 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in use of insulin through the application of sociodemographic and clinical instruments and the Brazilian versions of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measures - SDSCA and the IMDSES. Results: It was observed “ceiling effect” in Insulin domain. Reliability was confirmed in all IMDSES domains and Total Score (α=0.87). The convergent construct validity was supported by significant negative moderate to weak magnitude correlations between the scores of IMDSES domains and the scores of SDSCA domains. Criterion validity was partially supported by the weak magnitude correlation between the General Managements domain and the Total Score of IMDSES and serum levels of glycated hemoglobin (r=0.22; p=0.02). Conclusion: The Brazilian version of IMDSES presented satisfactory psychometric measures and may be useful to evaluate the effectiveness of nursing interventions aimed at optimizing the selfefficacy of the T2DM patient in the management of his treatment.

show abstract

Self-efficacy scale for Brazilians with type 1 diabetes

Cited by 17 publications

References 30 publications

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale – Short Form

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale – Short Form

Diabetes-Specific Questionnaires Validated in Brazilian Portuguese: A Systematic Review

Psychometric performance of the Brazilian version the “Insulin Management Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale” for patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About