2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-05722013000200001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biometria de frutos e sementes e germinação de melão-de-são-caetano

Abstract: RESUMO:Objetivou-se com este trabalho fazer a caracterização biométrica de frutos e sementes de melão-de-são-caetano (Momordica charantia L.) e determinar as temperaturas cardinais para germinação das sementes desta espécie. A caracterização e a condução do experimento foram realizadas no Laboratório de Análise de Sementes da UFERSA, em Mossoró-RN. Os parâmetros avaliados foram: comprimento, diâmetro, número de sementes por fruto; comprimento, largura e espessura das sementes; grau de umidade, peso de mil seme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The longitudinal axis of bitter melon had a mean of 39.61 mm, with amplitude ranging from 21.7 to 61.1 mm. In general, the values obtained were lower than results presented by Santana et al (2013), that most fruits present a length of 49 to 57 mm. Regarding the equatorial axis of the fruits, the values obtained ranged from 11.6 to 27.8 mm, with an average very near to highest frequency found by Santana et al (2013), from 17 to 19 mm.…”
Section: Ascertainment Of Size Weight and Pulp Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The longitudinal axis of bitter melon had a mean of 39.61 mm, with amplitude ranging from 21.7 to 61.1 mm. In general, the values obtained were lower than results presented by Santana et al (2013), that most fruits present a length of 49 to 57 mm. Regarding the equatorial axis of the fruits, the values obtained ranged from 11.6 to 27.8 mm, with an average very near to highest frequency found by Santana et al (2013), from 17 to 19 mm.…”
Section: Ascertainment Of Size Weight and Pulp Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…In general, the values obtained were lower than results presented by Santana et al (2013), that most fruits present a length of 49 to 57 mm. Regarding the equatorial axis of the fruits, the values obtained ranged from 11.6 to 27.8 mm, with an average very near to highest frequency found by Santana et al (2013), from 17 to 19 mm. The coefficients of variation of the longitudinal axis and equatorial axis of fruits were 22.59% and 18.40%, respectively, values similar to those obtained by Assis et al (2015), of 18.08% and 13.16%, respectively.…”
Section: Ascertainment Of Size Weight and Pulp Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Variations in fruit dimensions can be attributed to genetic variability, biotic and abiotic environmental factors, and genotype-environment interaction (SANTANA et al, 2013). The coefficient of variation found (20.3%) for fruit weight was higher than those for the other parameters related to fruits; however, this can be attributed to the different seed water contents during maturation, differences in time of fruit collection, and different climatic conditions of the sampling location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, the biometric study patterns of seeds from different populations can be an efficient method for this purpose, as they are the primary vehicle for the spread of germplasm. Variations in seed biometrics are intricately linked to environmental alterations and the genetic diversity of populations, which may be associated with their geographical origin (Brus et al, 2011;Santana, Torres, & Benedito, 2013;Costa et al, 2016;Khumaeva, Khabibov, & Muratchaeva, 2016;Rewicz, Bomanowska, Magda, & Rewicz, 2016;Pontes et al, 2018;Alfaro-Solís et al, 2020;Felix et al, Medeiros, Ferrari, Vieira, & Pacheco, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, seed biometry is performed to measure seed dimensions manually using a caliper (Oliveira, Araújo-Neto, Cruz, & Ferreira, 2012;Santana et al, 2013;Costa et al, 2016;Dutra et al, 2017;Menegatti, Mantovani, Navroski, & Souza, 2017;Roveri-Neto & Paula, 2017;Santos et al, 2018;Correia, Felix, Araujo, Ferrari, & Pacheco, 2019;Zuffo et al, 2019). However, this method requires a lot of time to obtain a sufficient sample size and is susceptible to human errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%