2000
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572000000100011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified CsCL protocol for lambda DNA purification: no enzymatic treatment/one phenol extraction

Abstract: A modification of the CsCl gradient centrifugation method for DNA phage purification is presented. It avoids the enzymatic steps as well the need for a preliminary phage titration, a tedious process proposed in the majority of the protocols in use. The quality of the DNA obtained makes it amenable for additional manipulations like digestions, ligations, labelling, subcloning, etc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol followed was a modification of CsCl lambda DNA purification described in Santelli and Navarro-Cattapan (2000) and in Andrade et al (2005).…”
Section: Rhynchosciara Americana Genomic Phage Library Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol followed was a modification of CsCl lambda DNA purification described in Santelli and Navarro-Cattapan (2000) and in Andrade et al (2005).…”
Section: Rhynchosciara Americana Genomic Phage Library Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Washes were done four times at 65-C with 2Â SSC, 0.1% SDS and twice with 0.1Â SSC, 0.1% SDS and exposed to a PhosphorImager system (Storm, Molecular Dynamics). After the first screening, the protocol for isolation of the positive recombinant was as described by Andrade et al (2005) and the lambda DNA purification was done following the protocol described by Santelli & Navarro-Cattapan (2000).…”
Section: Library Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modification, requiring less steps and fewer solutions to prepare, produces a DNA suitable for further manipulation like digestion, ligation, labelling, subcloning, etc. (Santelli and Navarro-Cattapan, 2000). Now we are proposing a shortcut for the Benton & Davis technique (Benton and Davis, 1977).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%