2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-95962003000600009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the performance of the modified direct agglutination test (MAT) for detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the sensitivity of the MAT was lower than that of ELISA and IFAT, its accuracy was higher and very similar to that of IHAT. In addition, the MAT is a simple, low-cost method that does not use a specific conjugate, whereas IFAT and ELISA require the use of a species-specific conjugate and the interpretation of the IFAT result is subjective (Ca ñón-Franco et al, 2003;Millar et al, 2012). Therefore, the MAT is the most indicated method among those tested for the diagnosis of T. gondii infection in chickens in epidemiological surveys designed to detect areas of environmental contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the sensitivity of the MAT was lower than that of ELISA and IFAT, its accuracy was higher and very similar to that of IHAT. In addition, the MAT is a simple, low-cost method that does not use a specific conjugate, whereas IFAT and ELISA require the use of a species-specific conjugate and the interpretation of the IFAT result is subjective (Ca ñón-Franco et al, 2003;Millar et al, 2012). Therefore, the MAT is the most indicated method among those tested for the diagnosis of T. gondii infection in chickens in epidemiological surveys designed to detect areas of environmental contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of the IFAT changes based on the cutoff values established (Björkman & Uggla, 1999). However, some authors have used this test as the gold standard to evaluate the accuracy of other tests for infection by both parasites (Cañón Franco et al, 2003). Meireles et al used negative and positive T. gondii controls determined by the IFAT to standardize the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Meireles et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%