Ética em pesquisa: dez anos da resolução CNS 196/96

Filho, José Marques

doi:10.1590/s0482-50042007000100002

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As this document 11 had little practical impact, in 1995 the CNS created a multidisciplinary executive working group (GET), bringing together physicians, nurses, theologians, engineers, members of the pharmaceutical industry, dentists and representatives of the health system users to review such research norms 46 . Coordinated by Professor William Saad Hossne 47 , the GET drafted the resolution minutes and analyzed the contributions received for six months of lectures, seminars, and meetings.…”

Section: Resolution 466/2012 Of the National Health Councilmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethical and legal analysis of scientific research on corpses in Brazil

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently there is an increasing interest in publications on the use of corpses for research in Brazil and worldwide. Scientific evidence reveal that these studies have little ethical and regulatory control. In Brazil, the regulation of this subject is scarce and scattered among laws and sublegal normative acts, hindering the knowledge of ethical and legal practices adopted by researchers. This article analyzes the laws and norms for scientific research on corpses in Brazil through a corpus that underlies this type of research. From the 1940-2012 period, we found seven documents of the Brazilian legislation that gather information for ethical and clear research. Finally, we present guidelines and a protocol to be followed by researchers for the development of ethical and legal studies with corpses in Brazil.

show abstract

Section: Resolution 466/2012 Of the National Health Councilmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethical and legal analysis of scientific research on corpses in Brazil

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…CONEP and the CEPs have been diversified in their composition in order to prevail the equity and universality in the background of its members, respecting the rule that determines that it could not have more than a half of member belonging to the same profession (BRASIL, 2013). The progressive decentering, based on the transference of attributions from CONEP to the CEPs reduced the time needed for the processing of the analysis of the research projects and complimentary resolutions were elaborated to normalize special thematic areas in order to observe the methodological diversity (MARQUES FILHO, 2007), without, however, respond to all critics regarding the lack of scope.…”

Section: Configurations Of the Regulation Of Ethics In Research With mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ética em pesquisa em ciências sociais: regulamentação, prática científica e controvérsias

Alves

Teixeira

2020

Educ. Pesqui.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo O texto é resultado do mapeamento, feito por meio da análise de documentos e notícias disponíveis em arquivo ou na web , de controvérsias científicas a respeito da regulamentação da ética em pesquisa com seres humanos no Brasil. Apresentam-se as controvérsias referentes à regulamentação da ética em pesquisa com seres humanos no Brasil, desde a implementação e operacionalização de princípios bioéticos com a Resolução 01/1988, e as sucessivas mudanças legais ao longo do tempo até a visibilização das controvérsias em relação às Ciências Humanas, Sociais e Sociais Aplicadas (CHSSA). Em um segundo momento, são apresentadas as controvérsias advindas dessa medida e o desenrolar do debate público entre a CONEP e os atores das CHSSA presentes no GT Ciências Humanas até o advento da resolução CNS510/2016. Por fim, são apresentadas as seguintes especificidades da pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais e suas implicações para a dimensão ética: lógica argumentativa, relacional e intersubjetiva, transparência, vulnerabilidade e proteção aos participantes. Conclui-se que a dimensão ética da pesquisa não é separada da dimensão metodológica de cada campo do conhecimento. Além disso, constatou-se que o alinhamento dos pesquisadores em ciências humanas e sociais na rede da regulamentação ética é frágil.

show abstract

“…In 1995, a 15-member group was created to reassess the 1988 resolution. After one year of work, Resolution 196/96 was issued, called Guidelines and Regulatory Standards for Research involving Human Subjects (Marques, 2007;Hossne, 2006). This resolution was elaborated based on multi and interdisciplinarity, covering suggestions from different social segments and regulating that any research involving human subjects has to be submitted to an IRB.…”

Section: Ethical Guidelines For Scientific Research Development In Brmentioning

confidence: 99%