Produção científica: critérios de avaliação de impacto

Vilhena, Valéria; Crestana, Maria Fazanelli

doi:10.1590/s0104-42302002000100024

Cited by 12 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The discussion on the positive side and the flaws or limitations of the impact factor dates from long ago (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) , but still remains on the spotlight, as proved by many relevant and fairly recent articles (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) . In this context, it is relevant to highlight that the citations of the articles published by Brazilian authors in national journals have already been analyzed for many years based on the data available by the ISI system (Institute of Scientific Information) (1,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) . Thus, it is interesting to observe that many health-related Brazilian journals, specially the most qualified ones, sometime on the last years, have published some articles on this issue, either to present a point of view (2,(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36) or to report the first factor impact article OpiniOn…”

Section: H-index Of the Citing Articles: A Contribution To The Evaluamentioning

confidence: 99%

Índice-H dos artigos citantes: uma contribuição para a avaliação da produção científica de pesquisadores experientes

Araújo

Sardinha

2011

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: there has been an increasing interest and need in evaluating the quality of scientific papers written by researchers. Therefore, the most important measurements used are the number of citations, the average number of citations per article published in indexed journals and the H-index. Those bibliometric indicators present, however, limitations when assessing the potential impact of the publications of a given researcher, particularly among the most productive ones. Objective:To propose and to demonstrate the use of a new scienciometric strategy -the H-index of the citing articles -, that allows better discriminationof the impact of a given researcher to the body of knowledge in the respective research area. Methods: Research data -Web of Science -from 13 of the most productive Brazilian PhD researchers in the field of exercise and sports sciences were analyzed, including: number of publications, number of citations, average number of citations per article, H-index and the proposed H-index of citing articles (the H-index extracted from the ranking of articles that cited the papers published by a given researcher). Data from four other researchers -Brazilian and foreign -were used as reference for comparisons. Results: The researcher's Hindex and the H-index of the citing articles were associated (r=.92; p>.01). However, when the six most productive authors with H-index above 7 were analyzed, the association between the two indexes dissapeared (r=.35 ; p=.49). Conclusions: The H-index of the citing articles can be useful to discriminate the scientific production of authors with a high number of published papers. It is suggested that this algorithm should be adopted by Brazilian and foreign financing and scientific production evaluation agencies.

show abstract

Section: H-index Of the Citing Articles: A Contribution To The Evaluamentioning

confidence: 99%

Índice-H dos artigos citantes: uma contribuição para a avaliação da produção científica de pesquisadores experientes

Araújo

Sardinha

2011

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…SciELO is considered a bibliometric index. Its value as a reference database was mentioned in Nature [15]. The bibliometric indicators adopted by SciELO methodology are equivalent to the ones of the Journal of Citation Reports published by ISI.…”

Section: Scielomentioning

confidence: 99%

Publicação de revistas científicas na Internet

Pereira

Souza²

2006

Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Scientific journals are the principal means of bibliographical research and publication of scientific research (Arenas, García, & Espasandín, 2001;Campos, 2003;Tahai & Meyer, 1999;Vilhena & Crestana, 2002), because they present the main results of investigations and constitute inputs for new ones (Romancini, 2004). Note that, in Brazil, in addition to scientific journals, especially in the field of Business Administration, academic conference papers (conference proceedings) have played an important role in divulging scientific research results.…”

Section: I I Introduction Ntroduction Ntroduction Ntroductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, according to various authors, the main purpose of ranking is to assess the quality of published scientific journals (Campos, 2003;Krzyzanowski & Ferreira, 1998;Tahai & Meyer, 1999;Vanti, 2002;Yamamoto et al, 1999). In Brazil, the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel [CAPES] (http://www.capes.gov.br) uses the impact factor to assess international scientific journals that are selected by the Institute for Scientific Information [ISI] (Campos, 2003;Vilhena & Crestana, 2002).…”

Section: I I Introduction Ntroduction Ntroduction Ntroductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking

Villas

Macedo-Soares

Russo

2008

BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article proposes a three-stage method, with the use of multiple rankings as a starting point in the first stage to help carry out bibliographical research in a more effective and systematic fashion. The relevance of this method is made evident by way of a pioneer empirical investigation on the use and importance of scientific journal rankings as perceived by Brazilian professors in the practice of bibliographical research in the field of Business Administration. The results suggest that, although there is an awareness of the importance of ranking as a criterion for bibliographical research, with a view to identifying the state of the art and relevant research gaps, ranking is in fact hardly used on a regular basis. It is believed that the proposed method can help overcome this problem and contribute to more effective literature reviews and research.

show abstract

Produção científica: critérios de avaliação de impacto

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

Índice-H dos artigos citantes: uma contribuição para a avaliação da produção científica de pesquisadores experientes

Índice-H dos artigos citantes: uma contribuição para a avaliação da produção científica de pesquisadores experientes

Publicação de revistas científicas na Internet

Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About