2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-11692008000100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assessment of the wound dressing procedure in patients at a university hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result may be related to the lack of training or workshop about infection control practice and policy of the hospitals relating improving quality of their care. This result disagrees with results of two studies from Brazil 15,16 and guideline 17 that verified that negligence, luck or deficit hand washing before and after wound dressing, exposing the patient to the pathogen and hospital infection risks. The sterile technique will be used in acute care setting; wearing sterile gloves allow handling of sterile supplies without contamination and open sterile dressing tray, or individually wrapped sterile supplies place on the bedside table.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…This result may be related to the lack of training or workshop about infection control practice and policy of the hospitals relating improving quality of their care. This result disagrees with results of two studies from Brazil 15,16 and guideline 17 that verified that negligence, luck or deficit hand washing before and after wound dressing, exposing the patient to the pathogen and hospital infection risks. The sterile technique will be used in acute care setting; wearing sterile gloves allow handling of sterile supplies without contamination and open sterile dressing tray, or individually wrapped sterile supplies place on the bedside table.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…The quality of the services a health institution delivers highly depends on its workers' technical competency and user interaction and communication skills, but also depends on other aspects, including ongoing work conditions and available material resources and support services (19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primeira era destinada à obtenção de dados de caracterização, e a segunda, parte específica, possuía oito questões, extraídas do questionário denominado Teste de Conhecimento a Respeito da Higienização das Mãos para Profissionais de Saúde (11) . Devido à falta de parâmetro para avaliação do conhecimento dos profissionais de saúde com a utilização do instrumento antes referido, adotou-se o Índice de Positividade (IP), que é interpretado a partir do número de respostas positivas (corretas), da seguinte forma: Desejável (100% de positividade); Adequado (99% a 90% de positividade); Seguro (89% a 80% de positividade); Limítrofe (79% a 71% de positividade); e Sofrível (70% ou menos de positividade) (12)(13) .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified