1994
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-11691994000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escala de atitude frente à aids: uma análise psicométrica

Abstract: The objective of the present methodological study was to construct and validate a scale of attitudes of people concerning AIDS, to aid in the diagnosis of favourable and unfavourable attitudes and evaluation of educational programs related to AIDS. The steps followed to develop the Likert-type scale were: elaboration of items related to knowledge, feelings and reactions about AIDS; apparent validation and verification of content; application of the instrument in a sample of people; evaluation of the ability to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess the constructs of interest, we searched for combinations of terms, including: “HIV/AIDS,” “stigma,” “prejudice,” “attitude,” “discrimination,” “measure,” and “scale.” This review excludes articles that were not published in English [32] as well as survey instruments that were not published in scientific journals [33]. Furthermore, the review only includes articles introducing a new measure of HIV stigma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the constructs of interest, we searched for combinations of terms, including: “HIV/AIDS,” “stigma,” “prejudice,” “attitude,” “discrimination,” “measure,” and “scale.” This review excludes articles that were not published in English [32] as well as survey instruments that were not published in scientific journals [33]. Furthermore, the review only includes articles introducing a new measure of HIV stigma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items with less than 80% agreement for any one of these evaluated criteria (relevance, clarity), were deleted or changed. We established for acceptance criteria of the items, those with discriminating powerFavorable or Unfavorable -with agreement among the experts of equal to or greater than 80%, conforming to what was encountered within the literature (10,12,15) . After re-structuring the instrument and the second evaluation by experts, we tested the agreement between the experts for the criteria of relevance and comprehensiveness of the items, using the Kendall (W) coefficient of concordance and the Cochran Q-test, which has the property of verifying if the opinion of the experts differed significantly, to analyze the criterion of clarity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O questionário inicial, aplicado aos clientes da UAN de uma empresa de confecções, apesar de construído com 20 itens respondeu satisfatoriamente, uma vez que só foram retirados 3 itens. Por outro lado, Moriya et al 15 alertam que uma escala extensa pode ser cansativa, desmotivando os respondentes a exporem suas respostas reais.…”
Section: I S C U S S ã Ounclassified