2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-026x2004000300013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revistas científicas e a constituição do campo de estudos de gênero: um olhar desde as "margens"

Abstract: R R R R Resumo esumo esumo esumo esumo: Este artigo trata do papel das revistas científicas na construção do campo de estudos de gênero. A partir da sociologia da ciência, da história da ciência e da experiência das autoras na publicação dos CADERNOS PAGUA literatura voltada para uma leitura crítica da história da ciência e da política científica tem iluminado aspectos ligados à relevância das revistas científicas, já há algumas décadas. Essa importância é sintetizada numa frase, taxativa, com a qual, no final… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the USA, the United Kingdom, and France are countries that can be considered “central” in science (they have research history and tradition, always ranked among the most productive countries, and are among the ones that cause greater impact in scientific research), notably, Portugal is Brazil’s third most frequent partner because science historians credit a certain “delay” in the constitution of a scientific community in Brazil to the fact that it was a colony of Portugal—due to the fact that there was no incentive to do scientific work given that the colonizer itself had no research tradition (Schwartzman, 2001 ), unlike countries colonized by the United Kingdom, for example. As seen in this study, as the Brazilian research on gender studies is mainly published in Portuguese, perhaps the use of the same language allows for greater dialogue between the two countries, a factor that the authors who analyzed Cadernos Pagu identified as a challenge for the area in the international debate (Lopes & Piscitelli, 2004 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the USA, the United Kingdom, and France are countries that can be considered “central” in science (they have research history and tradition, always ranked among the most productive countries, and are among the ones that cause greater impact in scientific research), notably, Portugal is Brazil’s third most frequent partner because science historians credit a certain “delay” in the constitution of a scientific community in Brazil to the fact that it was a colony of Portugal—due to the fact that there was no incentive to do scientific work given that the colonizer itself had no research tradition (Schwartzman, 2001 ), unlike countries colonized by the United Kingdom, for example. As seen in this study, as the Brazilian research on gender studies is mainly published in Portuguese, perhaps the use of the same language allows for greater dialogue between the two countries, a factor that the authors who analyzed Cadernos Pagu identified as a challenge for the area in the international debate (Lopes & Piscitelli, 2004 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Research in gender studies in Brazil is of paramount importance, and so far it has not been investigated in the dimension that we have adopted here. Previous papers that have investigated research on gender studies focused on specific areas (Bufrem & Nascimento, 2012 ; Devide et al, 2011 ; Espírito Santo, 2008 ) or were limited to certain topics (Brilhante et al, 2016 ; Minella, 2013 ; Resende et al, 2012 ) or to specialized journals in the area (Costa, 2008 ; Diniz & Foltran, 2004 ; Lopes & Piscitelli, 2004 ; Matos, 2018 ; Vieira et al, 2016 ). Thus, this study presents an unprecedented scope that is broader than other research carried out within gender studies: it aims to understand the research in this area in Brazilian science under a broader perspective, through its scientific production, analyzing bibliometric indicators of activity and collaboration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%