2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162005000600011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil tillage, water erosion, and calcium, magnesium and organic carbon losses

Abstract: Soil tillage influences water erosion, and consequently, losses of calcium, magnesium and organic carbon in surface runoff. Nutrients and organic carbon are transported by surface runoff in particulate form, adsorbed to soil colloids or soluble in water, depending on the soil tillage system. This study was carried out on an Inceptisol, representative of the Santa Catarina highlands, southern Brazil, between November 1999 and October 2001, under natural rainfall. The soil tillage treatments (no replications) we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Farming methods that use mechanical tillage, such as the mouldboard plough for seedbed preparation or discing for weed control, can promote soil C loss by several mechanisms: they disrupt soil aggregates, which protect soil organic matter from decomposition (Karlen & Cambardella, 1996;Six et al, 1999;Soares et al, 2005), they stimulate short-term microbial activity through enhanced aeration, resulting in increased levels of CO 2 and other gases released to the atmosphere (Bayer et al, 2000a;2000b;Kladivko, 2001), and they mix fresh residues into the soil where conditions for decomposition are often more favourable than on the surface (Karlen & Cambardella 1996;Plataforma Plantio Direto, 2006). Furthermore, tillage can leave soils more prone to erosion, resulting in further loss of soil C (Bertol et al, 2005;Lal, 2006).…”
Section: Conventional Versus No-tillage Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Farming methods that use mechanical tillage, such as the mouldboard plough for seedbed preparation or discing for weed control, can promote soil C loss by several mechanisms: they disrupt soil aggregates, which protect soil organic matter from decomposition (Karlen & Cambardella, 1996;Six et al, 1999;Soares et al, 2005), they stimulate short-term microbial activity through enhanced aeration, resulting in increased levels of CO 2 and other gases released to the atmosphere (Bayer et al, 2000a;2000b;Kladivko, 2001), and they mix fresh residues into the soil where conditions for decomposition are often more favourable than on the surface (Karlen & Cambardella 1996;Plataforma Plantio Direto, 2006). Furthermore, tillage can leave soils more prone to erosion, resulting in further loss of soil C (Bertol et al, 2005;Lal, 2006).…”
Section: Conventional Versus No-tillage Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food production can suffer from climate change impacts such as alteration in solar radiation period and extreme weather events (IPCC, 2001;Overpeck & Cole, 2006). Secondly, the illegal and random deforestation reduces crop production by jeopardizing environmental services such as crop pollination, genetic resources, clean air and water supplies (Foley et al, 2005), soil fertility and erosion (Bertol et al, 2005), pests and pathogen controls that help to maintain crop production (Ghini & Morandi, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The better ero-sion control as compared to the conventional tillage system leads to smaller losses of organic carbon and nutrients, mainly Ca and Mg (Bertol et al, 2005). Consequently, the area under NT in Brazil has grown in the last few years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bennett (1929Bennett ( , 1933Bennett ( , 1935Bennett ( , 1939Bennett ( , 1940Bennett ( , 1955, Pimentel et al (1995) and Uri (2000Uri ( , 2001 are among the leading researchers who have devoted time and effort to study the costs of on-site soil erosion (based on nutrient losses and drops in yield) and off-site soil erosion (based on off-site impacts). On-site costs can be calculated using the cost of nutrient replacement, associating the physical quantity of erosion associated with nutrient losses, normally macronutrients: calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, nitrogen and potassium (Amaral Sobrinho and Mazur, 2005;Adhikari and Nardella, 2011;Bertol et al, 2005Bertol et al, , 2007Gunatilake and Vieth, 2000;Marques et al, 1961;Pimentel et al, 1995;Pugliesi et al, 2011;Tengberg et al, 1997) calculated on the basis of market prices for commercial fertilizers and the quantity necessary to replace lost nutrients, plus the application cost. The calculations can be based on lost yield, i.e.…”
Section: Soil Erosion Cost Valuation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%