2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162000000300015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen dynamics in a soil-sugar cane system

Abstract: Results of an organic matter management experiment of a sugar cane crop are reported for the first cropping year. Sugar cane was planted in October 1997, and labeled with a 15 N fertilizer pulse to study the fate of organic matter in the soil-plant system. A nitrogen balance is presented, partitioning the system in plant components (stalk, tip and straw), soil components (five soil organic matter fractions) and evaluating leaching losses. The 15 N label permitted to determine, at the end of the growing season,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
15
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of leached N, both native and derived from fertilizer, was low, as observed in other studies with sugarcane (Ng Kee Kwong and Deville, 1984;Southwick et al, 1995). In field studies, Oliveira et al (2000) did not find substantial amounts of N leached at 1.0 m depth in a Rodic Kandiudalf. In this case, a smaller dose of fertilizer N was used (63 kg ha -1 de N-(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) and crop N use efficiency (60%) was higher than the 10 to 40% recovery usually registered in other experiments (Chapman et al, 1994;Trivelin et al, 1995;Vallis et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The amount of leached N, both native and derived from fertilizer, was low, as observed in other studies with sugarcane (Ng Kee Kwong and Deville, 1984;Southwick et al, 1995). In field studies, Oliveira et al (2000) did not find substantial amounts of N leached at 1.0 m depth in a Rodic Kandiudalf. In this case, a smaller dose of fertilizer N was used (63 kg ha -1 de N-(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) and crop N use efficiency (60%) was higher than the 10 to 40% recovery usually registered in other experiments (Chapman et al, 1994;Trivelin et al, 1995;Vallis et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Total available nitrogen in soil after harvesting eucalyptus is five times higher than the total nitrogen derived from natural process such as litterfall decomposition (Câmara et al, 2000). Sugar cane crops in Brazil are fertilized with nitrogen in rates from 60 to 120 kg N ha -1 , from different fertilizers sources, depending on the region and economic aspects (Oliveira et al, 2000). Thus, the application of nitrogen based fertilizer could favor an increase of the net mineralization and nitrification rates, enhancing the nitrate concentration in the streamwater, as observed in the data here collected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The change of natural vegetation in the Brazilian cerrado for agricultural use is associated to the increasing production of grain crops, sugar cane and eucalyptus (Klink & Machado, 2005). Among this, sugar cane is one of the most important agricultural commodities in Brazil and covers 5 million hectares, 50% of them located in the state of São Paulo (Oliveira et al, 2000). On top of this, the intense displacement of the cerrado natural vegetation by forestry activities has called attention of the general public, increasing pressure over paper and cellulose companies concerning the impacts on water resources (Espirito Santo, 1995;Vital et al, 1999;Câmara et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main fate of N fertilizer (about 20 to 40 %) applied to sugarcane is to remain in the soil, where the N immobilized by microorganisms resides in the organic fraction and is temporarily unavailable to the crop (Gava et al, 2005;Oliveira et al, 2000). N Fertilizer is also subject to loss through leaching, denitrification or NH 3 volatilization, which can occur from senescing plant leaves as well as from soils amended with alkalizing fertilizers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%