2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782011005000141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Métodos de avaliação de massa de forragem em pastagens de capim-estrela submetidas a intensidades de pastejo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CHe method showed intermediate correlation values (lower than the methods CH and WH 1 ). According to Arruda et al (2011), the correlation between CHe and forage biomass is dependent on the consistent relationship between TPD, resistance to vertical compression (resilience) and CH, and the differences between these factors can compromise the accuracy of biomass prediction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CHe method showed intermediate correlation values (lower than the methods CH and WH 1 ). According to Arruda et al (2011), the correlation between CHe and forage biomass is dependent on the consistent relationship between TPD, resistance to vertical compression (resilience) and CH, and the differences between these factors can compromise the accuracy of biomass prediction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reflects on the canopy growth, which evidences its phenotypic plasticity. In fact, Arruda et al (2011), working with Estrela grass, stated that allometric differences between canopy structures reduce the reliable prediction values of biomass, compromising the generation of calibration models. According to Schuwirth et al (2019), two aspects are fundamental for the chosen model to be able to predict the response variables with certainty, which are the sensitivity of the model to the specific management case and transferability (also called universality), which makes it more applicable in a condition of greater variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amount of GM is positively correlated with forage consumption and can be used to characterize pasture development [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Another important parameter for analyzing pasture development is dry matter (DM), derived as the forage mass present instantly above ground level per unit area without considering water content [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a need to determine the number of standard samples that understands all the variability in the pasture without removing an excessive amount of forage (Zanine et al, 2006 ). These measurements are necessary for the observer as training for the future estimates (Arruda et al, 2011), and validation of the sampling method, mainly in forages of cespitose growth (Cóser et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%