2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782009000600015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uso, ocupação das terras e banco de dados geográficos da metade sul do Rio Grande do Sul

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation coefficient of the data discussed here was 0.54 with data of the first paper and 0.77 with data of the second one. Some classes showed significant differences, by instances Bolfe et al (2009) evaluated 50% of area occupied by "pastures" in the state, but the value was about 30% for the other works. The area occupied by water was 19-20% in the Caiuba region, due to the occurrence of the lagoons.…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The correlation coefficient of the data discussed here was 0.54 with data of the first paper and 0.77 with data of the second one. Some classes showed significant differences, by instances Bolfe et al (2009) evaluated 50% of area occupied by "pastures" in the state, but the value was about 30% for the other works. The area occupied by water was 19-20% in the Caiuba region, due to the occurrence of the lagoons.…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Data of the municipality of Pelotas (Filippini Alba & Siqueira, 1999) and data for the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Bolfe et al, 2009) were compared to data presented here, after legend conversion. The correlation coefficient of the data discussed here was 0.54 with data of the first paper and 0.77 with data of the second one.…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assim, há a necessidade de intervenções científicas de caráter vertical com a prerrogativa de conhecer o potencial arqueológico, bem como ressaltando o grau de perturbação observado nos sítios arqueológicos da zona rural em virtude destas áreas serem exploradas mecanicamente para outras finalidades (agricultura e silvicultura) (BOLFE et al, 2009). (Prous, 1986(Prous, /1990 O uso do solo por meio de práticas agrícolas, tais como a mecanização intensa e outras práticas que necessitam interferência direta como processos de terraplanagem, remoção e revolvimento do solo em grande escala e construção de estradas, são alguns dos principais processos causadores de deterioração e perda do patrimônio arqueológico e cultural na região de estudo, segundo identificado durante o referencial bibliográfico.…”
Section: )unclassified
“…Todavia, considerando a necessidade de exploração das áreas pela agricultura, segundo Bolfe et al (2009)…”
Section: )unclassified