Consórcio soja-milho: V. efeito de sistemas de consórcio e de semeadura do milho

Alvarenga, Deny Alves M.G; Rezende, Pedro Milanez de; Andrade, Messias José Bastos de; Andrade, Luiz Antônio de Bastos

doi:10.1590/s0103-84781998000200003

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Intercropping soybean into maize did not affected maize biomass yield (Table 2). Similar results were reported by Alvarenga et al (1998). Furthermore, Martin et al (1998) studding the effect of soybean cultivars on maize-soybean intercrop biomass reported that none of them resulted in significantly lower biomass yields than the maize monocrop.…”

Section: Plant Stand and Maize Biomass Yieldsupporting

confidence: 82%

Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Intercropped Maize+Soybean With Different Relative Maturity Cycle

Batista¹,

Adami²,

Sartor³

et al. 2018

JAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The success of maize+soybean intercrop depends on the correct synchronism between species phenological stages at the silage point. Due to it, the experiment was carried out to evaluate maize+soybean intercrop forage yield and silage quality using crops with different maturity cycle combination. The experiment used a randomized complete block design with a 2 × 3 factorial scheme. Treatments consisted of two maize hybrids (1: P1630YHR-early cycle and 2: middle cycle P30F53VYHR) and two soybean cultivars (P95R51-maturity cycle of 5.1; TMG7062-maturity cycle of 6.2) and one control represented by maize monocrop. Silage harvesting was performed when maize had reached 2/3 milk line stage. Intercropping soybean into maize did not affect its biomass yield. Both soybean cultivars present compatible cycles for ensiling together with maize hybrids, since they were in phenological stages from R5.3 to R7 by the time maize was at its optimum stage for ensiling. There was interaction between species for the soybean biomass yield. Maize hybrid P30F53 produced higher biomass yield than P1630 what also resulted in higher amount of total crude protein yield. Intercrop P1630-P95R51 produced 458 Kg ha-1 of crude protein more than maize monocrop. Maize+soybean intercropping system results in higher silage crude protein percentage and yield per area (Kg of CP ha-1).

show abstract

Section: Plant Stand and Maize Biomass Yieldsupporting

confidence: 82%

Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Intercropped Maize+Soybean With Different Relative Maturity Cycle

Batista¹,

Adami²,

Sartor³

et al. 2018

JAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The productivity of soybean-corn intercropping generally is higher than its pure cultures, which is reflected in productivity index as the Relative Yield Total (RYT) of 1.31 to 1.49 [2], 1.11 to 1.15 [6], 1.09 to 1.11 [20], 1.18 [18], 1.1 to 1.22 [1], 1.3 to 1.45 [13]. However in some situations have been reported RYT less than one [6,18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Productivity and Carbon Balance of Soybean-Corn Intercrops are affected by the Density of Corn

2015

IJSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biomass Yield for Silage and Grain Yield of Maize Intercropped With Soybean

Batista¹,

Adami²,

Oligini³

et al. 2020

RBMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maize is one of the main cereals produced worldwide and, in association withsoybean crop, can result in benefits to the production system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass yield for silage and grain yield in maize crop, in the maizesoybean intercropping system. The study was conducted in the municipality of Dois Vizinhos - PR, Brazil, using a randomized block design, with nine treatments and four replicates. The treatments were composed of three maize hybrids grown in monoculture and in intercropping with two soybean cultivars (P1630+TMG7062, P1630+P95R51, P1630, LG6030+TMG7062, LG6030+P95R51, LG6030, P30F53+TMG7062, P30F53+P95R51 and P30F53). The data were subjected to analysis of variance and, when there was significance, Scott-Knott test was applied. Maize biomass yield for silage was approximately 4,000 kg ha-1 higher when the hybrids LG6030 and/or P30F53 were used. The cultivar TMG7062 stands out from P95R51 in terms of dry biomass yield for silage. The higher the percentage of soybean biomass added to the silage, the higher its crude protein content. However, crude protein yield per area was similar for the evaluated treatments. Some yield components (number of grains per row and thousand-grain weight) and grain yield of maize differ according to the hybrid used, but similarity is observed between intercropping and monoculture. There is evidence that the soybean cultivar TMG7062, intercropped with P1630, has the potential to reduce the grain yield of the cereal.

show abstract

Consórcio soja-milho: V. efeito de sistemas de consórcio e de semeadura do milho

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Intercropped Maize+Soybean With Different Relative Maturity Cycle

Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Intercropped Maize+Soybean With Different Relative Maturity Cycle

Productivity and Carbon Balance of Soybean-Corn Intercrops are affected by the Density of Corn

Biomass Yield for Silage and Grain Yield of Maize Intercropped With Soybean

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About