2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-63512008000300003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diferenciação regional da indústria brasileira: agrupamento e ordenação a partir de um novo índice

Abstract: ResumoA partir da análise de componentes principais, é proposto um indicador para estimar o nível de desenvolvimento da indústria nas unidades da federação e nas 137 mesorregiões do país. Os resultados encontrados confirmam os desequilíbrios regionais existentes destacando os estados das regiões Sul e Sudeste com resultados mais favoráveis. A análise por mesorregião confirma a melhor situação dos estados do Sul/Sudeste, indicando, porém, a existência de alto grau de heterogeneidade em seu interior. Foram ainda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This industrial deconcentration movement was more pronounced in the first period analyzed (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009), which was characterized by growing participation of the North, Northeast and Midwest regions in national industrial employment, especially in industries with low technological intensity (Saboia et al , 2008;Campolina, Rezende & Paixão, 2012;Azzoni & Sobrinho, 2014) Cruz and Santos (2011), applying spatial analysis methods, found that the geographic center of employment concentration of the country in this period shifted in the northeast direction However, unlike the pattern observed for the other industries, the high-technology group -which requires more qualified labor and higher research and develop-Revista de Economia Política 41 (4), 2021 • pp. 760-781 ment investments -became more concentrated between 2002 and 2009 (G grew by 18 55%) In this respect, Garcia, Araújo and Mascarini (2009) pointed out that in this period, the regions that attracted the most investments in sectors with high technological content were precisely those with locational advantages, such as greater concentration of qualified labor Furthermore, the group of high-technology industries was favored by tax incentives for regional development, such as the Manaus Free Trade Zone Consequently, in the second period (2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014), there was a reversal of the industrial deconcentration trend of the previous period, with increasing concentration This was due to the increased in the concentration of the high-tech industries (G grew by 38 62%) and industries of low technologic (G grew by 3 85%)…”
Section: Geographic Distribution Of Manufacturing In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This industrial deconcentration movement was more pronounced in the first period analyzed (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009), which was characterized by growing participation of the North, Northeast and Midwest regions in national industrial employment, especially in industries with low technological intensity (Saboia et al , 2008;Campolina, Rezende & Paixão, 2012;Azzoni & Sobrinho, 2014) Cruz and Santos (2011), applying spatial analysis methods, found that the geographic center of employment concentration of the country in this period shifted in the northeast direction However, unlike the pattern observed for the other industries, the high-technology group -which requires more qualified labor and higher research and develop-Revista de Economia Política 41 (4), 2021 • pp. 760-781 ment investments -became more concentrated between 2002 and 2009 (G grew by 18 55%) In this respect, Garcia, Araújo and Mascarini (2009) pointed out that in this period, the regions that attracted the most investments in sectors with high technological content were precisely those with locational advantages, such as greater concentration of qualified labor Furthermore, the group of high-technology industries was favored by tax incentives for regional development, such as the Manaus Free Trade Zone Consequently, in the second period (2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014), there was a reversal of the industrial deconcentration trend of the previous period, with increasing concentration This was due to the increased in the concentration of the high-tech industries (G grew by 38 62%) and industries of low technologic (G grew by 3 85%)…”
Section: Geographic Distribution Of Manufacturing In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Resultados semelhantes são encontrados em Saboia (2000), para a primeira década de 1990, que enfatiza o fortalecimento dos locais do interior daqueles estados que tradicionalmente empregam mais na indústria, e também discutidos por Saboia et al (2008), que realizam uma breve revisão da literatura a respeito da realocação das atividades industriais. Nesse artigo, por meio da construção de um Índice de Desenvolvimento Industrial, os autores reforçam a conclusão da concentração das indústrias mais desenvolvidas no Sudeste e Sul do Brasil, com algumas extensões em locais específicos das demais regiões.…”
Section: Referencial Teóricounclassified