2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-507x2010000100011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entendendo o conceito PIRO: da teoria à prática clínica - parte 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(36) The PIRO concept is useful for categorizing septic patients to develop studies both to better understand the pathophysiology and to improve therapeutics. (37)…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(36) The PIRO concept is useful for categorizing septic patients to develop studies both to better understand the pathophysiology and to improve therapeutics. (37)…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trata-se de uma condição patológica muito complexa que necessita de diversos equipamentos, medicamentos e uma equipe especializada para o seu tratamento, sendo a principal geradora de custos no sistema público e particular. Nos Estados Unidos, um paciente com sepse despende cerca de US$ 38 mil e, no Brasil, o gasto hospitalar médio diário é de US$ 1.028, variando de acordo com a gravidade e tempo de internação (ROSOLEM et al, 2010) Logo, pode-se observar o impacto da doença, principalmente, ao sistema público de saúde, considerando a grande ocupação de leitos e o tratamento custoso.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Recently, an early version of the PIRO staging model for risk stratification in severe sepsis developed with classification was used to obtain a scoring system and was validated by using 2 (two) global databases of patients with severe sepsis (840 and 10,610 patients). 16 The PIRO VAP score was then developed as a concept for stratifying the risk of death of patients with VAP in the ICU. A prospective observational cohort study was conducted by Lisboa T. et al (2008) which included 441 patients with VAP in 3 multidisciplinary ICUs.…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%