Programas sociais no Brasil: um estudo sobre o programa bolsa família no interior do nordeste brasileiro

Zimmermann, Clóvis Roberto; Espínola, Gepherson Macêdo

doi:10.1590/s0103-49792015000100010

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast, studies have indicated that the growth in household income has improved the quality of foods from the Brazilian basic food basket 27,30 consumed by these women and their families, since a greater intake of beans was identified among beneficiaries compared to non-beneficiaries. Even though the financial aid provided by the BFP is incapable of changing the living standards of families, it meets the immediate needs, with food purchase reaching around 90%, which reinforces the program intent of alleviating poverty and stopping hunger in future generations 31 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Distribution of indicators for chronic non-communicable diseases in adult women beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program — Vigitel 2016–2019

Carvalho

Sá

Bernal

et al. 2021

Rev. bras. epidemiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To compare the prevalence of and trend in risk and protective factors for chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) among women beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of Bolsa Família from 2016 to 2019. Methods: This is a cross-sectional time-series study. We estimated the prevalence and prevalence ratios, both crude and adjusted for age and schooling, of NCD indicators with their respective confidence intervals, using the Poisson regression model. A time-trend analysis was also performed employing a simple linear regression model, regarding the indicators as the outcome variable and the year of the survey as the explanatory variable. Results: Women beneficiaries were more exposed to risk factors for NCDs compared to non-beneficiaries. Prevalence ratios adjusted for smokers were 1.15 (1.07 – 1.24), for overweight were 1.08 (1.03 – 1.14), and for obesity were 1.09 (1.04 – 1.14), while the recommended fruit and vegetable consumption was 0.93 (0.87 – 0.99); they also showed lower practice of leisure-time physical activities (0.88; 0.82 – 0.93), spent more time watching TV (1.08; 1.02 – 1.13), had worse self-rated health status (1.12; 1.04 – 1.21), and lower rates of mammography (0.80; 0.71 – 0.90) and pap smear (0.93; 0.88 – 0.98). Among the beneficiaries, the trend analysis showed an increased prevalence of overweight, from 55.9 to 62.6%, and screen time except for TV, from 13.5 to 27.8%. Conclusion: NCD risk factors were higher among women beneficiaries of Bolsa Família, indicating the importance of maintaining affirmative policies for this vulnerable population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Distribution of indicators for chronic non-communicable diseases in adult women beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program — Vigitel 2016–2019

Carvalho

Sá

Bernal

et al. 2021

Rev. bras. epidemiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this study, it has been observed that more than half of pregnant women fall into the age group of 19-34, which is an adequate age group for female reproduction since, in this stage, there is a minor risk for obstetric complications 15 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Socioeconomic and nutritional aspects of pregnant women assisted by Programa Bolsa Família: cohort NISAMI

Lisboa

Santana

Servo

et al. 2022

Ciênc. saúde coletiva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to evaluate the socioeconomic and nutritional assistance factors of pregnant women who are beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program and were attended at a prenatal service in the city of Recôncavo da Bahia. A cohort study was conducted with 250 pregnant women from the prenatal service in 16 Family Health Units from August 2013 to December 2014. A structured and previously tested questionnaire was used to collect data. Socioeconomic and nutritional variables were used. It was identified that the average age was 28.3 years, of these, 85.2% studied until high school, 72.4% of pregnant women reported having income less than or equal to two minimum wages, with a mean of 1,036.3 and 26.8% reported receiving the benefit. It was observed that 40% had a pre-gestational Body Mass Index of overweight, 38% presented adequate weight gain for Gestational Age; 90.57% performed more than 7 consultations and 75.6% reported that they made use of alcoholic beverages or stopped in the gestation. The Bolsa Família Program as an integrated strategy for social inclusion and economic development seems to have a protective effect on the nutritional health of pregnant women in the municipality.

show abstract

“…The sample of the present study was predominantly composed of women, as was the case in other population studies with persons assisted by social support 32,33 . This was a datum that represented the responsibility undertaken by the female gender to decide about the application of the resources received.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualidade de vida, coesão e adaptabilidade em famílias beneficiárias do Programa Bolsa Família

Rosalini

Probst

Cunha

et al. 2019

Ciênc. saúde coletiva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We evaluated the association between quality of life, family cohesion and sociodemographic factors of beneficiary families of the Bolsa-Família Program (PBF). This was an analytical, cross-sectional study with exploratory methodology. The sample was composed of 385 respondents. The dependent variable was the quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), and the independent variables were sociodemographic characteristics, self-rated health, family cohesion and adaptability (FACES III). The best quality of life was associated with an age younger than or equal to 36 years (OR = 2.15), higher educational level (OR = 1.54), good/very good health (OR = 6.39), not having current health problem (OR = 5.68), no treatment (OR = 1.76), moderate (OR = 3.39) and high (OR = 3.66) family cohesion and moderate adaptability (OR = 2.23). Individuals from families with moderate and high family cohesion were more likely to have a better quality of life than those from families with low cohesion. The male volunteers were 3.54 times more likely to have a better quality of life. It was concluded that moderate and high levels of cohesion may impact positively to the quality of life of persons receiving the PBF, indicating that social programs should seek to strengthen these dynamics.

show abstract

Programas sociais no Brasil: um estudo sobre o programa bolsa família no interior do nordeste brasileiro

Cited by 8 publications

References 6 publications

Distribution of indicators for chronic non-communicable diseases in adult women beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program — Vigitel 2016–2019

Distribution of indicators for chronic non-communicable diseases in adult women beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program — Vigitel 2016–2019

Socioeconomic and nutritional aspects of pregnant women assisted by Programa Bolsa Família: cohort NISAMI

Qualidade de vida, coesão e adaptabilidade em famílias beneficiárias do Programa Bolsa Família

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About