2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502008000700011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two experimental models of urodynamic evaluation in female rats

Abstract: PURPOSE: Urodynamic studies in small animals can be performed through urethral sounding or cystostomy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the two methods of urodynamic evaluation in female rats. METHODS: Ten female rats weighing on average 250g, under anesthesia with urethane (1,25 mg/kg) were submitted in three repeats to an urethal catheter of 0,64 mm in external diameter for cystometric measurements of vesicle pressure(VP1) and contraction time (CT1). The catheter was extracted at a constant velocity of 0.05 cm/minute u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first method, the presence of the cystostomy catheter and the suture, if not made in a rigorous form, may reduce vesicle capacity by reducing its area, possibly causing an increase in the voiding frequency. On the other hand, the catheter in the urethra used in the second method could act as an obstructive factor in bladder emptying, causing increased bladder pressure [13]. We preferred the first method to obtain optimal bladder pressure which is the most important parameter in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first method, the presence of the cystostomy catheter and the suture, if not made in a rigorous form, may reduce vesicle capacity by reducing its area, possibly causing an increase in the voiding frequency. On the other hand, the catheter in the urethra used in the second method could act as an obstructive factor in bladder emptying, causing increased bladder pressure [13]. We preferred the first method to obtain optimal bladder pressure which is the most important parameter in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have forty-eight measurements of urethral length from literature 14,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and twenty estimated corresponding body masses 18,44 . Similarly, twenty-four urethral diameters are obtained from literature 34,42,43,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] and twelve corresponding body masses 18,[55][56][57][58][59][60] , listed in Table 2 and Table 3 in the Supplement. We determine the cross section of urethra A by image analysis.…”
Section: Anatomical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 3 shows urethral length (8,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) and diameter (15,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), flow rate (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42), bladder capacity (25,(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49), and bladder pressure (1,35,39,40,43,46,50) for over 100 individuals across 13 species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%