2016
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-8529.2016380100011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legitimising Emerging Power Diplomacy: an Analysis of Government and Media Discourses on Brazilian Foreign Policy under Lula

Abstract: This study analyses whether Brazilian foreign policy under Lula successfully legitimised the country's international identity as a rising power in the eyes of the domestic and international media. Based on a constructivist framework, we have applied French Discourse Analysis to a corpus of 36 official addresses by the President of the Republic and the Minister of Foreign Relations and 137 news articles from four news outlets, two Brazilian and two international, concerning two diplomatic episodes deemed repres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though successive administrations have unvaryingly underscored the primacy of South America, scholarship remains divided. Some authors emphasize that Brazil sees the region merely as a stepping-stone for global ambitions (Spektor 2010;Vigevani and Cepaluni 2011;Lazarou and Theodoro 2015), or that Brasilia stands astride its region and the world (Malamud and Rodriguez 2014), and that its Global South identity at times eclipses its South American one (Mesquita and Medeiros 2016).…”
Section: Brazilian Foreign Policy In a Changing International Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though successive administrations have unvaryingly underscored the primacy of South America, scholarship remains divided. Some authors emphasize that Brazil sees the region merely as a stepping-stone for global ambitions (Spektor 2010;Vigevani and Cepaluni 2011;Lazarou and Theodoro 2015), or that Brasilia stands astride its region and the world (Malamud and Rodriguez 2014), and that its Global South identity at times eclipses its South American one (Mesquita and Medeiros 2016).…”
Section: Brazilian Foreign Policy In a Changing International Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new Brazilian foreign policy included the aim for "continental solidarity" and the construction of "a more equitable and democratic international order" (Da Silva 2005, 2). The Brazilian diplomatic activity of this period reflected the new goals of foreign policy (Mesquita & Medeiros 2016;Visentini 2011). For Lula, Brazil needed to stop thinking of itself as a third-world country that depended on the United States and the European Union to decide on what it was allowed or not to do (Da Silva 2005, 11).…”
Section: Brazilian Diplomacy -Non-indifference -Minustah -Internationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speeches, decisions, encounters, meetings, campaigns, promises, agreements, and disagreements can "produce effects that are both theoretical and material, symbolic and pragmatic" (Richey 2001, 179), but they are also recognized within certain limits of intelligibility. Mesquita and Medeiros (2016) describe four stages through which a State may reshape its role in the world: (a) Breakdown of consensus on identity commitments;…”
Section: A Space For a 'Feminist' Diplomatic Agenda?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, foreign aid is an abstract concept, and by providing a concrete example through the Haitian case, it is possible that we too were not properly addressing the desirability bias problem. Additionally, the topic of MINUSTAH has been repeatedly highlighted in the media (Mesquita and Medeiros 2016), and Brazil has received more than 96 thousand Haitian migrants since 2010, which might have increased public awareness of and sensitivity to this issue. Ultimately, when stimulated with this type of framing, people put a face to foreign aid recipients, making it more difficult to claim that the country should cut foreign aid due to moral constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%