2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006000200005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs' (CPITN) for population periodontitis screening

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to validate two versions of CPITN for periodontitis diagnosis. A sample of 400 individuals underwent full mouth periodontal examination including Clinical Attachment Loss, Periodontal Pocket Depth, and Sub-gingival Calculus. Full and partial CPITN versions were derived from this exam (gold standard). Contingency tables were constructed and operational characteristics obtained, as well as ROC curves. The results show 58% sensitivity for full CPITN and 80.6% specificity. Positive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has nonetheless shown that the CPITN may under-or overestimate the level of periodontal pocketing or fail to reflect the level of pocketing in all teeth. Similar to our study, one paper compared the CPITN to a measurement of periodontal probing taken from every tooth, but it found that the CPITN fails to measure periodontal disease in comparison to the full mouth assessment (p < 0.001) [Bassani et al, 2006]. Another study also reports that CPITN often underestimates the depth of periodontal pocketing in sextants that have deeper pockets [DiamantiKipioti et al, 1993] despite the CPITN formerly being reported as having better suitability for severe disease diagnosis [Ainamo and Ainamo, 1985].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Previous research has nonetheless shown that the CPITN may under-or overestimate the level of periodontal pocketing or fail to reflect the level of pocketing in all teeth. Similar to our study, one paper compared the CPITN to a measurement of periodontal probing taken from every tooth, but it found that the CPITN fails to measure periodontal disease in comparison to the full mouth assessment (p < 0.001) [Bassani et al, 2006]. Another study also reports that CPITN often underestimates the depth of periodontal pocketing in sextants that have deeper pockets [DiamantiKipioti et al, 1993] despite the CPITN formerly being reported as having better suitability for severe disease diagnosis [Ainamo and Ainamo, 1985].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…PD is a common disease, with the mild and moderate forms affecting 30 to 50% of the adult population, and the severe form affecting 5 to 15% of the adults in the United States 3 . These estimates are confirmed by studies conducted with the Brazilian population [4][5] . A study performed in São Paulo showed that 45% of the subjects presented some degree of periodontal impairment and 5% presented severe PD 6 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, this index has some limitations, such as the underestimation of the less severe periodontal conditions (for example, calculus and gingival bleeding) and underestimation of the outcome prevalence. These weaknesses are particularly relevant when etiological studies are taken into account 50 .…”
Section: S148mentioning
confidence: 99%