2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352013000300033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alimentação de vacas F1 Holandês x Zebu com suplementos nitrogenados e monensina sódica: avaliação do consumo, parâmetros ruminais e produção de leite

Abstract: Avaliaram-se suplementos nitrogenados contendo ou não monensina sódica, adicionados à silagem, sobre o consumo de matéria seca (CMS), a digestibilidade da MS (DMS) e a produção de vacas F1 Holandês x Zebu. Vacas (n=15) com 21 dias em lactação, produzindo 19,2kg/dia, foram distribuídas em um delineamento quadrado latino 5X5, com três vacas por tratamento (T). Os T foram: 1- concentrado durante as ordenhas e silagem de milho após as ordenhas (C.SM); 2- C.SM + nitromineral (C.SMNM); 3- C.SM + nitroproteico (C.SMN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molar proportions of acetate and propionate were 68.8% and 28.2%, respectively, which are within the normal ranges of 54 to 74% (acetate) and 16 to 27% (propionate) proposed by Silva and Leão (1979) and by Filho and Pina (2011). Although the present study was conducted in a closed and restricted system (in vitro) and despite the fact that the rumen is a dynamic environment, with passage of solids and liquids and entry of saliva and feed, our results corroborate in vivo studies (Heldt et al 1999;Laguna et al 2013;Gonçalves et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The molar proportions of acetate and propionate were 68.8% and 28.2%, respectively, which are within the normal ranges of 54 to 74% (acetate) and 16 to 27% (propionate) proposed by Silva and Leão (1979) and by Filho and Pina (2011). Although the present study was conducted in a closed and restricted system (in vitro) and despite the fact that the rumen is a dynamic environment, with passage of solids and liquids and entry of saliva and feed, our results corroborate in vivo studies (Heldt et al 1999;Laguna et al 2013;Gonçalves et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%