2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352009000600012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intake, digestibility, ruminal parameters, and microbial protein synthesis in crossbred steers fed diets based on Brachiaria grass silage and sorghum silage

Abstract: Intake, digestibility, ruminal parameters, and microbial protein synthesis in crossbred steers fed diets based on Brachiaria grass silage and sorghum silage [Consumo, digestibilidade, parâmetros ABSTRACTA trial was carried out with four Holstein x Nellore crossbred steers (225±22kg of BW) fitted with ruminal and abomasal cannulaes in a 4 x 4 Latin Square design to evaluate the intake and the total and partial apparent digestibilities of nutrients, ruminal parameters, and microbial synthesis. Diets consisted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The digestibility of NDF, ADF and gross energy were not affected by treatment (P ≥ 0.12). The low values of DM and crude protein digestibility in steers fed STMR suggested an imbalance between available energy and nitrogen (N) in the diet, with available N being greater than available energy (Chizzotti et al 2009). This is supported by the ruminal NH 3 -N content of steers fed STMR being greater (P = 0.01) than other groups at 4 h after feeding (Table 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digestibility of NDF, ADF and gross energy were not affected by treatment (P ≥ 0.12). The low values of DM and crude protein digestibility in steers fed STMR suggested an imbalance between available energy and nitrogen (N) in the diet, with available N being greater than available energy (Chizzotti et al 2009). This is supported by the ruminal NH 3 -N content of steers fed STMR being greater (P = 0.01) than other groups at 4 h after feeding (Table 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observed no palatability problems though their research studies reported that grass silage can produce as much milk per cow as alfalfa silage when rations are balanced. Rodrigues et al [104], Barrière et al [105]., Pereira et al [106] and Chizzotti et al [107]. all reported satisfactory DM intake with appropriate concentrate levels of diets containing grass hay or silage as roughage.…”
Section: Observations Of Palatability and Performance Of Heifersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The complete rich diet containing concentrates combined with good Conocarpus silage lead to high growth rates for the experimental heifers groups. Barrière et al (2004), Chizzotti et al (2009), Dalton et al (2008) and Rodrigues et al (2002), reported satisfactory DM intake with appropriate concentrate levels of diets containing grass hay or silage as roughage. On the other hand, Carvalho et al (2006) and Evans et al (2004) found no effect of concentrate ratios on DM intake, while Pereira et al (2008) traced digestibility parameters in beef cattle-fed diets containing silage and concentrates.…”
Section: Dm Intake and Live Weight Gain Of Heifersmentioning
confidence: 98%