2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352009000400021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Produção e qualidade do pasto de coastcross consorciado ou não com amendoim forrageiro com ou sem aplicação de nitrogênio

Abstract: RESUMOAvaliaram-se a taxa de acúmulo foliar (TAF), a produção total de forragem (PTF), a composição química da forragem e os valores de digestibilidade in vitro da matéria seca (DIVMS) do coastcross (Cynodon dactylon) e do amendoim forrageiro (Arachis pintoi) em pastagem consorciada. Foram avaliados os tratamentos (parcelas): coastcross + A. pintoi sem nitrogênio (CA0); coastcross + A. pintoi com 100kg de nitrogênio (CA100); coastcross com 200kg de nitrogênio (C200) e coastcross + A. pintoi com 200kg de nitrog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In their evaluation of coastcross intercropped with forage peanuts, Lenzi et al (2009) the consortium sufficed to meet the nutritional requirements of livestock in spring and summer when the forage accumulation rate is highest. Ribeiro et al (2012) noted that nitrogen fertilization also favors forage peanut growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their evaluation of coastcross intercropped with forage peanuts, Lenzi et al (2009) the consortium sufficed to meet the nutritional requirements of livestock in spring and summer when the forage accumulation rate is highest. Ribeiro et al (2012) noted that nitrogen fertilization also favors forage peanut growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A difference (p ≤ 0.05) was detected for organic matter in situ digestibility in October (Table 2), with the highest value observed for the red clover, which also presented the highest variability in the levels compared to the peanut forage. For both legumes, the mean values were high, above those reported by Lenzi et al (2009), with digestibility values of 68 and 70% for the whole plant of peanut forage for the dry and rainy season, respectively. Besides that, it was registered correlations between the levels of in situ digestibility with neutral detergent fiber (r = -0.66; p = 0.0181, for the peanut; r = -0.88; p = 0.0037, for the clover) and with crude protein (r = 0.85; p = 0.0004, for the peanut; r = 0.92; p = 0.0014, for the clover).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Isto, certamente foi devido às baixas temperaturas e a quase ausência de chuvas que são comuns nessa estação (Figura 1). Diante de tais circunstâncias, mesmo que haja boa intensidade luminosa às plantas, a falta de água e temperatura adequada diminui o processo fotossintético, proporcionando baixa produção de massa de forragem Paris et al, 2009;LENZI et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified