2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-32892011000400010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectativas da mídia sobre o legado das olimpíadas de 2016: racionalidade instrumental e substantiva

Abstract: Este estudo tem por objetivo discutir a expectativa da mídia sobre o futuro legado dos Jogos Olímpicos de 2016, para a cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Foram consultadas 360 edições de cinco dos principais jornais editados no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Dezessete categorias foram construídas, a partir da análise das notícias veiculadas nos tablóides. O enfoque utilizado na discussão aproveita as concepções de racionalidade instrumental e substantiva para analisar os limites históricos que a razão instrumental nos impõe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although boredom was conceptualized as a negative and unidimensional construct, it is currently continued to be viewed as a negative but a multi-dimensional construct (Culp, 2006). Fairly early in dissecting the construct, Bernstein (1975) categorized boredom based on whether it was “chronic” or “responsive,” where the earlier category referred to frequently experienced boredom that was experienced irrespective of external stimuli, and the latter was deemed as a response to external stimuli. Thereafter, building on chronic and responsive boredom, two broad categorizations of boredom evolved – trait and state boredom.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although boredom was conceptualized as a negative and unidimensional construct, it is currently continued to be viewed as a negative but a multi-dimensional construct (Culp, 2006). Fairly early in dissecting the construct, Bernstein (1975) categorized boredom based on whether it was “chronic” or “responsive,” where the earlier category referred to frequently experienced boredom that was experienced irrespective of external stimuli, and the latter was deemed as a response to external stimuli. Thereafter, building on chronic and responsive boredom, two broad categorizations of boredom evolved – trait and state boredom.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%