2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612010000400032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of thermobacteriological parameters and size of Bacillus stearothermophilus ATCC 7953 spores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental z values determined from the survivor curve (27.39°C) was not significantly different p>0.05 from the calculated z ‐value (27.51°C). These values are closer to that (23.7°C) reported for corn‐soybean mix (Fraiha et al, 2010), but lower (6.64°C) when compared to the spore suspensions of Geobacillus stearothermophilus T26 (Gómez‐Jódar et al, 2016). Variation in the z ‐value may be due to the type of sterilization medium adopted, as it has been reported that the z value in dry heat is higher than in moist heat (Toledo, 2007) or even in hydrogen peroxide.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental z values determined from the survivor curve (27.39°C) was not significantly different p>0.05 from the calculated z ‐value (27.51°C). These values are closer to that (23.7°C) reported for corn‐soybean mix (Fraiha et al, 2010), but lower (6.64°C) when compared to the spore suspensions of Geobacillus stearothermophilus T26 (Gómez‐Jódar et al, 2016). Variation in the z ‐value may be due to the type of sterilization medium adopted, as it has been reported that the z value in dry heat is higher than in moist heat (Toledo, 2007) or even in hydrogen peroxide.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The D values obtained at temperatures below at 121°C are similar to the range (4.20–6.16 min) reported for heat resistance of B. stearothermophilus (FS 1518) in some food products like asparagus, corn, peas, and spinach (Toledo, 2007). A high D 121.1°C (12.71 min) value obtained in this study may likewise be related to high value of 14.2 min at 121°C reported by Fraiha et al (2010) for B. stearothermophilus (ATCC 7953) in the corn‐soybeans mix. The calculated D ‐values (using Equation (1)) observed in this study are 11.40, 7.19, and 5.06 min at 110, 116, and 121°C respectively (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inactivation of bacterial endospores mostly requires a temperature of 30 to 40 • C higher than inactivation of vegetative cells of the same strain [34,35]. Based on values for the decimal reduction time (D-value, time to reduce the counts by one log cycle at a certain temperature and in a certain matrix) published for the spores of a number of bacterial species [36,37], only a very small reduction could have been expected. For example, reported D-values are about 30 min for B. cereus and C. perfringens endospores at 85 • C and 90 • C, respectively, [38] and 7-13 min for C. botulinum E at 74 • C [36].…”
Section: Impact Of Heat Treatment On Microbiological Quality Of Frassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bromocresol purple (a pH detector) was added to detect spore growth. The growth of spores decreases pH and changes the color purple to yellow after a 24-hour incubation period (Farshad et al 2014;Fraiha et al 2010). The biological indicator in the test trial was placed in a horizontal as possible, as recommended by the manufacturer.At the end of cycle, the ProsPore2 indicator was cap sealed.The glass ampoule of media was crushed and the Geobacillus stearothermophilus disc was contaminated.Figure1 showed that biological indicator.Vials were then incubated at 55°C for 48 hours.If the ProsePore2 biological indicator retained its purple color(Figure 1(a)), it showed an adequate sterilization cycle and if it signed turbidity or a color change toward yellow for that sterilization cycle, it explanated insuffi cient of sterilization and the chance of microbial pollution Figure 1(b)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%